Literature DB >> 1775850

In vitro susceptibility vs. in vivo efficacy of various antimicrobial agents against the Bacteroides fragilis group.

I Brook1.   

Abstract

In vitro susceptibility testing is only one step in the evaluation of the potential efficacy of antimicrobial agents against the Bacteroides fragilis group. An assessment of in vivo efficacy, with a consideration of the factors that can best be studied in an infected host, is also an integral part of this process. Abscess models in rodents have been used to correlate in vitro activity with in vivo efficacy against this group of microorganisms. For metronidazole, clindamycin, moxalactam, and cefoxitin, the correlation was strong; for chloramphenicol and carbenicillin, it was not. In vivo studies of mixed infection with the B. fragilis group and Escherichia coli showed that cefoxitin and imipenem were effective; in contrast, cefotetan was not effective against resistant strains. Only strains susceptible to ceftizoxime in the agar dilution test were also affected by this drug in vivo. The so-called inoculum effect noted with ceftizoxime may explain this finding. In vivo elimination of encapsulated organisms of the B. fragilis group was found to be more difficult than elimination of unencapsulated isolates. The beta-lactamase produced by Bacteroides species can protect the enzyme-producing organism as well as its partners in mixed infections from the effects of beta-lactam antibiotics. These data illustrate the complexity and difficulties encountered when in vitro activity is correlated with in vivo efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1775850     DOI: 10.1093/clinids/13.6.1170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Infect Dis        ISSN: 0162-0886


  7 in total

Review 1.  The immune response and antibacterial therapy.

Authors:  Olachi Anuforom; Graham R Wallace; Laura V Piddock
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Containing cefoxitin costs through a program to curtail use in surgical prophylaxis.

Authors:  G Taylor; E Blondel-Hill; P Kibsey; E Friesen; R Tisdell; W Vaudry
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  1993-09

Review 3.  Moraxella catarrhalis: from emerging to established pathogen.

Authors:  Cees M Verduin; Cees Hol; André Fleer; Hans van Dijk; Alex van Belkum
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  In vitro activity of trovafloxacin against Bacteroides fragilis in mixed culture with either Escherichia coli or a vancomycin- resistant strain of Enterococcus faecium determined by an anaerobic time-kill technique.

Authors:  L E Stearne; C Kooi; W H Goessens; I A Bakker-Woudenberg; I C Gyssens
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Clinical significance of anaerobic bacteremias in a general hospital. A prospective study from 1988 to 1992.

Authors:  J Gómez; V Baños; J Ruiz; F Herrero; M Pérez; L Pretel; M Canteras; M Valdés
Journal:  Clin Investig       Date:  1993-08

6.  Alloiococcus otitidis Forms Multispecies Biofilm with Haemophilus influenzae: Effects on Antibiotic Susceptibility and Growth in Adverse Conditions.

Authors:  Chun L Chan; Katharina Richter; Peter-John Wormald; Alkis J Psaltis; Sarah Vreugde
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 5.293

7.  Beta-lactamase-producing nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae fails to protect Streptococcus pneumoniae from amoxicillin during experimental acute otitis media.

Authors:  Eva Westman; Susanne Lundin; Ann Hermansson; Asa Melhus
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.191

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.