Literature DB >> 17750262

Interpretation of cloud-climate feedback as produced by 14 atmospheric general circulation models.

R D Cess, G L Potter, J P Blanchet, G J Boer, S J Ghan, J T Kiehl, H LE Treut, Z X Li, X Z Liang, J F Mitchell, J J Morcrette, D A Randall, M R Riches, E Roeckner, U Schlese, A Slingo, K E Taylor, W M Washington, R T Wetherald, I Yagai.   

Abstract

Understanding the cause of differences among general circulation model projections of carbon dioxide-induced climatic change is a necessary step toward improving the models. An intercomparison of 14 atmospheric general circulation models, for which sea surface temperature perturbations were used as a surrogate climate change, showed that there was a roughly threefold variation in global climate sensitivity. Most of this variation is attributable to differences in the models' depictions of cloud-climate feedback, a result that emphasizes the need for improvements in the treatment of clouds in these models if they are ultimately to be used as climatic predictors.

Entities:  

Year:  1989        PMID: 17750262     DOI: 10.1126/science.245.4917.513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  7 in total

1.  Rise of interdisciplinary research on climate.

Authors:  Spencer Weart
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Simulation of Sahel drought in the 20th and 21st centuries.

Authors:  I M Held; T L Delworth; J Lu; K L Findell; T R Knutson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Substitution of a hydrophobic residue alters the conformational stability of Shaker K+ channels during gating and assembly.

Authors:  K McCormack; L Lin; F J Sigworth
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  The impact of parametrized convection on cloud feedback.

Authors:  Mark J Webb; Adrian P Lock; Christopher S Bretherton; Sandrine Bony; Jason N S Cole; Abderrahmane Idelkadi; Sarah M Kang; Tsuyoshi Koshiro; Hideaki Kawai; Tomoo Ogura; Romain Roehrig; Yechul Shin; Thorsten Mauritsen; Steven C Sherwood; Jessica Vial; Masahiro Watanabe; Matthew D Woelfle; Ming Zhao
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  MODIS comparisons with northeastern Pacific in situ stratocumulus microphysics.

Authors:  Stephen R Noble; James G Hudson
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 4.261

6.  Diurnal cloud cycle biases in climate models.

Authors:  Jun Yin; Amilcare Porporato
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Tuning the MPI-ESM1.2 Global Climate Model to Improve the Match With Instrumental Record Warming by Lowering Its Climate Sensitivity.

Authors:  Thorsten Mauritsen; Erich Roeckner
Journal:  J Adv Model Earth Syst       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 6.660

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.