Literature DB >> 1774585

Neuronal activity related to visually guided saccadic eye movements in the supplementary motor area of rhesus monkeys.

J D Schall1.   

Abstract

1. The purpose of this study was to describe the response properties of neurons in the supplementary motor area (SMA), including the supplementary eye fields (SEF) of three rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) performing visually guided eye and forelimb movements. Seven hundred thirty single units were recorded in the dorsomedial agranular cortex while monkeys performed a go/no-go visual tracking task. The unit activity associated with rewarded, task-related movements was compared with that associated with unrewarded, spontaneous movements executed in the intertrial interval or when the task was not running. A number of neuronal response types were identified. 2. Sensory cells were characterized by their response to the visual and/or auditory target stimuli combined with no discharge associated with eye or forelimb movements. New information was provided about the receptive fields of the visual cells; they varied in size and, although many included the ipsilateral hemifield, they tended to emphasize the contralateral. A significant proportion of the visually responsive cells had receptive fields restricted to within 8 degrees of the fovea. The response latency was relatively long (greater than 90 ms) and variable. 3. Preparatory set cells were activated from the appearance of the target until the presentation of the go/no-go cue. This subpopulation ceased firing 50-100 ms before the movement was initiated. These cells tended to respond best in relation to contralateral movements. The response latency was similar to that of the sensory cells, although some of these units began to discharge in anticipation of predictable target presentations. These neurons were not active before unrewarded, spontaneous saccades. 4. Sensory-movement cells comprised the largest population of neurons identified in SMA. They were active from the appearance of the target until after the execution of the saccade. These neurons tended to respond preferentially in association with contraversive saccades. The latency of response to the target was significantly longer than that of the sensory cells. There was a large amount of variability in the time to reach the peak level of activation, and this population of units generally became inactivated shortly after the saccade was initiated. Although there were counterexamples, most sensory-movement cells responded equally in association with visually and auditory guided movements. In addition, these neurons were not active in relation to self-generated eye movements made during the intertrial intervals. 5. Pause-rebound cells were identified by their suppression at the appearance of the target and subsequent discharge associated with the saccade. These units tended to respond preferentially to contralateral targets.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1774585     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1991.66.2.530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  54 in total

1.  Self-organizing task modules and explicit coordinate systems in a neural network model for 3-D saccades.

Authors:  M A Smith; J D Crawford
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Supplementary eye field: influence of eye position on neural signals of fixation.

Authors:  J Schlag; M Schlag-Rey; I Pigarev
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Bidirectional control of saccadic eye movements by the disconnected cerebral hemispheres.

Authors:  H C Hughes; P A Reuter-Lorenz; R Fendrich; M S Gazzaniga
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Role of primate basal ganglia and frontal cortex in the internal generation of movements. III. Neuronal activity in the supplementary motor area.

Authors:  R Romo; W Schultz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Different roles of the frontal and parietal regions in memory-guided saccade: a PCA approach on time course of BOLD signal changes.

Authors:  Motoaki Sugiura; Jobu Watanabe; Yasuhiro Maeda; Yoshihiko Matsue; Hiroshi Fukuda; Ryuta Kawashima
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  A neural representation of sequential states within an instructed task.

Authors:  Michael Campos; Boris Breznen; Richard A Andersen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Supplementary eye field encodes option and action value for saccades with variable reward.

Authors:  Na-Young So; Veit Stuphorn
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Performance monitoring local field potentials in the medial frontal cortex of primates: supplementary eye field.

Authors:  Erik E Emeric; Melanie Leslie; Pierre Pouget; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Supplementary eye field activity reflects a decision rule governing smooth pursuit but not the decision.

Authors:  Shun-nan Yang; Helen Hwang; Joel Ford; Stephen Heinen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Homologous mechanisms of visuospatial working memory maintenance in macaque and human: properties and sources.

Authors:  Robert M G Reinhart; Richard P Heitz; Braden A Purcell; Pauline K Weigand; Jeffrey D Schall; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.