Literature DB >> 1774579

Interactive effects among several stimulus parameters on the responses of striate cortical complex cells.

T J Gawne1, B J Richmond, L M Optican.   

Abstract

1. Although neurons within the visual system are often described in terms of their responses to particular patterns such as bars and edges, they are actually sensitive to many different stimulus features, such as the luminances making up the patterns and the duration of presentation. Many different combinations of stimulus parameters can result in the same neuronal response, raising the problem of how the nervous system can extract information about visual stimuli from such inherently ambiguous responses. It has been shown that complex cells transmit significant amounts of information in the temporal modulation of their responses, raising the possibility that different stimulus parameters are encoded in different aspects of the response. To find out how much information is actually available about individual stimulus parameters, we examined the interactions among three stimulus parameters in the temporally modulated responses of striate cortical complex cells. 2. Sixteen black and white patterns were presented to two awake monkeys at each of four luminance-combinations and five durations, giving a total of 320 unique stimuli. Complex cells were recorded in layers 2 and 3 of striate cortex, with the stimuli centered on the receptive fields as determined by mapping with black and white bars. 3. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to these data with the three stimulus parameters of pattern, the luminance-combinations, and duration as the independent variables. The ANOVA was repeated with the magnitude and three different aspects of the temporal modulation of the response as the dependent variables. For the 19 neurons studied, many of the interactions between the different stimulus parameters were statistically significant. For some response measures the interactions accounted for more than one-half of the total response variance. 4. We also analyzed the stimulus-response relationships with the use of information theoretical techniques. We defined input codes on the basis of each stimulus parameter alone, as well as their combinations, and output codes on the basis of response strength, and on three measures of temporal modulation, also taken individually and together. Transmitted information was greatest when the response of a neuron was interpreted as a temporally modulated message about combinations of all three stimulus parameters. The interaction terms of the ANOVA suggest that the response of a complex cell can only be interpreted as a message about combinations of all three stimulus parameters.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1774579     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1991.66.2.379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  6 in total

1.  Assessing the performance of neural encoding models in the presence of noise.

Authors:  J C Roddey; B Girish; J P Miller
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Ruling out and ruling in neural codes.

Authors:  Adam L Jacobs; Gene Fridman; Robert M Douglas; Nazia M Alam; Peter E Latham; Glen T Prusky; Sheila Nirenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Decoding cortical neuronal signals: network models, information estimation and spatial tuning.

Authors:  T W Kjaer; J A Hertz; B J Richmond
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.621

4.  The structure of pairwise correlation in mouse primary visual cortex reveals functional organization in the absence of an orientation map.

Authors:  Daniel J Denman; Diego Contreras
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-05-19       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Complex spectral interactions encoded by auditory cortical neurons: relationship between bandwidth and pattern.

Authors:  Kevin N O'Connor; Pingbo Yin; Christopher I Petkov; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-05

6.  A Temporal Sampling Basis for Visual Processing in Developmental Dyslexia.

Authors:  Kim Archer; Kristen Pammer; Trichur Raman Vidyasagar
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.