Literature DB >> 1774152

The recognition potential contrasted with the P300.

A P Rudell1.   

Abstract

An electrical response of the brain to recognizable images was described. The response (referred to as the "recognition potential") occurred for words, pictures, and faces, but not for non-meaningful control images. It was best recorded from the occipital area. The peak latency was 200-250 ms. It differed from the P300 response in latency, topography, and sensitivity to probability of occurrence. Its amplitude depended on the site of recording and the visual field stimulated. Degradation of the images caused equal increases in reaction time (RT) and recognition potential latency. The results contradicted the proposal that the latency of the P300 can be used as a measure of the timing of stimulus evaluation processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1774152     DOI: 10.3109/00207459109082040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Neurosci        ISSN: 0020-7454            Impact factor:   2.292


  10 in total

1.  Left cortical specialization for visual letter strings predicts rudimentary knowledge of letter-sound association in preschoolers.

Authors:  Aliette Lochy; Marie Van Reybroeck; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Effects of long-time reading experience on reaction time and the recognition potential.

Authors:  Alan P Rudell; Bin Hu
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 2.997

3.  Combined ERP/fMRI evidence for early word recognition effects in the posterior inferior temporal gyrus.

Authors:  Joseph Dien; Eric S Brian; Dennis L Molfese; Brian T Gold
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Emotional states modulate the recognition potential during word processing.

Authors:  Taomei Guo; Min Chen; Danling Peng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The effects of gender and self-insight on early semantic processing.

Authors:  Xu Xu; Chunyan Kang; Taomei Guo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Rapid stream stimulation can enhance the stimulus selectivity of early evoked responses to written characters but not faces.

Authors:  Canhuang Luo; Wei Chen; Ye Zhang; Carl Michael Gaspar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Phrase Depicting Immoral Behavior Dilates Its Subjective Time Judgment.

Authors:  Lina Jia; Bingjie Shao; Xiaocheng Wang; Zhuanghua Shi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-12-24

8.  Nudging the N170 forward with prior stimulation-Bridging the gap between N170 and recognition potential.

Authors:  Canhuang Luo; Wei Chen; Rufin VanRullen; Ye Zhang; Carl Michael Gaspar
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  New insights into name category-related effects: is the Age of Acquisition a possible factor?

Authors:  Roberta Adorni; Alice Mado Proverbio
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 3.759

10.  The temporal dynamics of implicit processing of non-letter, letter, and word-forms in the human visual cortex.

Authors:  Lawrence G Appelbaum; Mario Liotti; Ricardo Perez; Sarabeth P Fox; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.