Literature DB >> 17741042

Experimental research on jury decision-making.

R J Maccoun.   

Abstract

Because trial juries deliberate in secrecy, legal debates about jury functioning have relied heavily on anecdote and speculation. In recent years, investigators have begun to challenge many common assumptions about jury behavior. An important tool in this effort has been the mock jury experiment, in which research participants are randomly assigned to alternative trial conditions and asked to reach a verdict in a simulated case. Researchers have used mock jury experiments to test hypotheses about causal influences on jury behavior and to develop theoretical models of the jury deliberation process.

Entities:  

Year:  1989        PMID: 17741042     DOI: 10.1126/science.244.4908.1046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  4 in total

1.  Ethics, evolution and culture.

Authors:  Alex Mesoudi; Peter Danielson
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 1.919

Review 2.  Student progress decision-making in programmatic assessment: can we extrapolate from clinical decision-making and jury decision-making?

Authors:  Mike Tweed; Tim Wilkinson
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Crowdsourcing punishment: Individuals reference group preferences to inform their own punitive decisions.

Authors:  Jae-Young Son; Apoorva Bhandari; Oriel FeldmanHall
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  The Impact of Cognitive Biases on Professionals' Decision-Making: A Review of Four Occupational Areas.

Authors:  Vincent Berthet
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-01-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.