Literature DB >> 1773956

Competition for hydrogen by human faecal bacteria: evidence for the predominance of methane producing bacteria.

A Strocchi1, J K Furne, C J Ellis, M D Levitt.   

Abstract

Studies of sludge have shown that some species of sulphate reducing bacteria outcompete methane producing bacteria for the common substrate H2. A similar competition may exist in human faeces where the methane (CH4) producing status of an individual depends on the faecal concentration of sulphate reducing bacteria. To determine if non-methanogenic faeces outcompete CH4 producing faeces for H2, aliquots of each type of faeces were incubated alone or mixed together, with or without addition of 10% H2 and/or 20 mmol/l sulphate. Methane producing faeces consumed H2 significantly more rapidly and reduced faecal H2 tension to a lower value compared with non-methanogenic faeces. The mixture of the two types of faeces yielded significantly more CH4 than CH4 producing faeces alone (mean (SD) 8.5 (1.3) v 2.9 (0.45) mmol/l of homogenate per 24 hours, p less than 0.01). Faecal sulphide concentrations were similar in CH4 producing and non-producing homogenates both before and after 24 hours of incubation. The addition of sulphate to the homogenates did not significantly influence CH4 production or sulphide formation. Our results suggest that in human faeces methane producing bacteria outcompete other H2 consuming bacteria for H2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1773956      PMCID: PMC1379250          DOI: 10.1136/gut.32.12.1498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  10 in total

1.  Kinetic analysis of competition between sulfate reducers and methanogens for hydrogen in sediments.

Authors:  D R Lovley; D F Dwyer; M J Klug
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Incidence of methanogenic bacteria in a sigmoidoscopy population: an association of methanogenic bacteria and diverticulosis.

Authors:  G A Weaver; J A Krause; T L Miller; M J Wolin
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Studies on breath methane: the effect of ethnic origins and lactulose.

Authors:  P Pitt; K M de Bruijn; M F Beeching; E Goldberg; L M Blendis
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Relationships between hydrogen (H2) and methane (CH4) production in man.

Authors:  A Bjørneklett; E Jenssen
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 2.423

5.  Breath hydrogen response to lactulose in healthy subjects: relationship to methane producing status.

Authors:  D Cloarec; F Bornet; S Gouilloud; J L Barry; B Salim; J P Galmiche
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Use of a three-stage continuous culture system to study the effect of mucin on dissimilatory sulfate reduction and methanogenesis by mixed populations of human gut bacteria.

Authors:  G R Gibson; J H Cummings; G T Macfarlane
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Competition for hydrogen between sulphate-reducing bacteria and methanogenic bacteria from the human large intestine.

Authors:  G R Gibson; J H Cummings; G T Macfarlane
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1988-09

8.  Occurrence of sulphate-reducing bacteria in human faeces and the relationship of dissimilatory sulphate reduction to methanogenesis in the large gut.

Authors:  G R Gibson; G T Macfarlane; J H Cummings
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1988-08

9.  Alternative pathways for hydrogen disposal during fermentation in the human colon.

Authors:  G R Gibson; J H Cummings; G T Macfarlane; C Allison; I Segal; H H Vorster; A R Walker
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Breath methane and large bowel cancer risk in contrasting African populations.

Authors:  I Segal; A R Walker; S Lord; J H Cummings
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 23.059

  10 in total
  18 in total

1.  Genetic and evolutionary constraints for the symbiosis between animals and methanogenic bacteria.

Authors:  J H Hackstein; P Langer; J Rosenberg
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Factors influencing frequency of flatus emission by healthy subjects.

Authors:  J K Furne; M D Levitt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Prevalence and consistency of low breath H2 excretion following lactulose ingestion. Possible implications for the clinical use of the H2 breath test.

Authors:  G Corazza; A Strocchi; M Sorge; G Bentai; G Gasbarrini
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Methanogenesis in the human large intestine.

Authors:  T Florin
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  Sulphate reducing bacteria and hydrogen metabolism in the human large intestine.

Authors:  G R Gibson; G T Macfarlane; J H Cummings
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Methanogens outcompete sulphate reducing bacteria for H2 in the human colon.

Authors:  A Strocchi; J Furne; C Ellis; M D Levitt
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Colonic hydrogen elimination and methane production in infants with and without infantile colic syndrome.

Authors:  Amir Belson; Avinash K Shetty; Peter D Yorgin; Yoram Bujanover; Yochanan Peled; Mor H Dar; Shimon Reif
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Gastro-enteric methane versus sulphate and volatile fatty acid production.

Authors:  L Nollet; W Verstraete
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.513

9.  H2 metabolism is widespread and diverse among human colonic microbes.

Authors:  Patricia G Wolf; Ambarish Biswas; Sergio E Morales; Chris Greening; H Rex Gaskins
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2016-05-03

10.  Hydrogenotrophic microbiota distinguish native Africans from African and European Americans.

Authors:  Gerardo M Nava; Franck Carbonero; Junhai Ou; Ann C Benefiel; Stephen J O'Keefe; H Rex Gaskins
Journal:  Environ Microbiol Rep       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 3.541

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.