Literature DB >> 17728974

Safety testing of cell-based medicinal products: opportunities for the monocyte activation test for pyrogens.

Thomas Montag1, Ingo Spreitzer, Bettina Löschner, Uwe Unkelbach, Egbert Flory, Ralf Sanzenbacher, Michael Schwanig, Christian K Schneider.   

Abstract

The European Partnership for Alternative Approaches to Animal Testing (EPAA) pointed out the need to involve authorities throughout the process of validation and legal acceptance of alternatives to animal experiments. The Paul-Ehrlich-Institute (PEI), Federal Agency for Sera and Vaccines, is the national competent authority in Germany which is responsible for the quality and safety of biologicals including blood and cell-based products. This paper is intended to contribute to the discussion concerning the use of alternative methods in safety testing of medicinal products and considers the scientific work of the PEI in this field. From a regulator's perspective, adequate demonstration of safety and quality of medicinal products are of major interest. Additionally, the availability of the products to the patient has to be taken into consideration. It has to be carefully explored whether the respective in vitro method for demonstration of non-clinical safety as part of the non-clinical development programme is able to guarantee safety level comparable to the corresponding experiment in animals. The topics cited above shall be discussed in this paper using the example of the Alternative Pyrogen Test or also called Monocyte Activation Test. The Alternative Pyrogen Test could serve as paradigm to exemplify how an alternative test can provide at least a comparable level of safety estimation in comparison with a conventional animal test. Furthermore, this alternative test creates additional information which cannot be obtained from the animal experiment, and might also open further scientific insight into the mechanisms of pyrogenicity and acute pro-inflammatory reactions in patients. This test method allows the definition of pyrogen limits for medicinal products. Due to its use of relevant cell systems this in vitro test might contribute significantly to safety assessments of advanced medicinal products during the pre-clinical phase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17728974     DOI: 10.14573/altex.2007.2.81

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ALTEX        ISSN: 1868-596X            Impact factor:   6.043


  3 in total

1.  Bordetella Pertussis Toxin does not induce the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines in human whole blood.

Authors:  Christina Bache; Ingo Spreitzer; Bjoern Becker; Bettina Loeschner; Ute Rosskopf; Kay-Martin Hanschmann; Michael Schwanig; Christian K Schneider; Bernhard Lieb; Thomas Montag
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2012-04-15       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Ethics of animal research in human disease remediation, its institutional teaching; and alternatives to animal experimentation.

Authors:  Rajkumar Cheluvappa; Paul Scowen; Rajaraman Eri
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2017-08

3.  Prevention of intestinal allergy in mice by rflaA:Ova is associated with enforced antigen processing and TLR5-dependent IL-10 secretion by mDC.

Authors:  Stefan Schülke; Sonja Wolfheimer; Gabriele Gadermaier; Andrea Wangorsch; Susanne Siebeneicher; Peter Briza; Ingo Spreitzer; Dirk Schiller; Bettina Loeschner; Satoshi Uematsu; Bernard Ryffel; Shizuo Akira; Zoe Waibler; Stefan Vieths; Masako Toda; Stephan Scheurer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.