AIM OF STUDY: After cardiac arrest, uninterrupted chest compressions with restoration of myocardial blood flow facilitates restoration of spontaneous circulation. We recognized that this may best be accomplished with a mechanical device and especially so during transport. We therefore sought to develop a lightweight, portable chest compressor which may be carried on the belt or attached to the oxygen tank typically carried on the back of the first response rescuer. A miniaturized pneumatic chest compressor (MCC) weighing less than 2 kg was developed and compared with a currently marketed "Michigan Thumper", which weighed 19 kg. We hypothesized that the 2 kg, low profile, portable device will be as effective as the standard pneumatic Thumper for restoring circulation during CPR. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ventricular fibrillation was electrically induced in 10 domestic male pigs weighing 39+/-2 kg, and untreated for 5 min. Animals were then randomized to receive chest compressions with either the MCC or the Thumper. After 5 min of mechanical chest compression, defibrillation was attempted with a 150 J biphasic shock. Coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) and end tidal PCO(2) (EtPCO(2)) were measured by conventional techniques together with right carotid artery blood flow (CBF). RESULTS: Four of five animals compressed with the Thumper and each animal compressed with the MCC were successfully resuscitated. No significant differences in CPP, EtPCO(2), CBF and post-resuscitation myocardial function were observed between groups. Resuscitated animals survived for more than 72 h without neurological impairment. CONCLUSION: The low profile, 2 kg miniaturized chest compressor is as effective as the conventional Thumper in an experimental model of CPR.
AIM OF STUDY: After cardiac arrest, uninterrupted chest compressions with restoration of myocardial blood flow facilitates restoration of spontaneous circulation. We recognized that this may best be accomplished with a mechanical device and especially so during transport. We therefore sought to develop a lightweight, portable chest compressor which may be carried on the belt or attached to the oxygen tank typically carried on the back of the first response rescuer. A miniaturized pneumatic chest compressor (MCC) weighing less than 2 kg was developed and compared with a currently marketed "Michigan Thumper", which weighed 19 kg. We hypothesized that the 2 kg, low profile, portable device will be as effective as the standard pneumatic Thumper for restoring circulation during CPR. MATERIAL AND METHODS:Ventricular fibrillation was electrically induced in 10 domestic male pigs weighing 39+/-2 kg, and untreated for 5 min. Animals were then randomized to receive chest compressions with either the MCC or the Thumper. After 5 min of mechanical chest compression, defibrillation was attempted with a 150 J biphasic shock. Coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) and end tidal PCO(2) (EtPCO(2)) were measured by conventional techniques together with right carotid artery blood flow (CBF). RESULTS: Four of five animals compressed with the Thumper and each animal compressed with the MCC were successfully resuscitated. No significant differences in CPP, EtPCO(2), CBF and post-resuscitation myocardial function were observed between groups. Resuscitated animals survived for more than 72 h without neurological impairment. CONCLUSION: The low profile, 2 kg miniaturized chest compressor is as effective as the conventional Thumper in an experimental model of CPR.
Authors: Aurora Magliocca; Davide Olivari; Daria De Giorgio; Davide Zani; Martina Manfredi; Antonio Boccardo; Alberto Cucino; Giulia Sala; Giovanni Babini; Laura Ruggeri; Deborah Novelli; Markus B Skrifvars; Bjarne Madsen Hardig; Davide Pravettoni; Lidia Staszewsky; Roberto Latini; Angelo Belloli; Giuseppe Ristagno Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2019-01-08 Impact factor: 5.501