Literature DB >> 17727074

Test-retest reliability and cross validation of the functioning everyday with a wheelchair instrument.

Tamara L Mills1, Margo B Holm, Mark Schmeler.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to establish the test-retest reliability and content validity of an outcomes tool designed to measure the effectiveness of seating-mobility interventions on the functional performance of individuals who use wheelchairs or scooters as their primary seating-mobility device. The instrument, Functioning Everyday With a Wheelchair (FEW), is a questionnaire designed to measure perceived user function related to wheelchair/scooter use. Using consumer-generated items, FEW Beta Version 1.0 was developed and test-retest reliability was established. Cross-validation of FEW Beta Version 1.0 was then carried out with five samples of seating-mobility users to establish content validity. Based on the content validity study, FEW Version 2.0 was developed and administered to seating-mobility consumers to examine its test-retest reliability. FEW Beta Version 1.0 yielded an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) Model (3,k) of .92, p < .001, and the content validity results revealed that FEW Beta Version 1.0 captured 55% of seating-mobility goals reported by consumers across five samples. FEW Version 2.0 yielded ICC(3,k) = .86, p < .001, and captured 98.5% of consumers' seating-mobility goals. The cross-validation study identified new categories of seating-mobility goals for inclusion in FEW Version 2.0, and the content validity of FEW Version 2.0 was confirmed. FEW Beta Version 1.0 and FEW Version 2.0 were highly stable in their measurement of participants' seating-mobility goals over a 1-week interval.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17727074     DOI: 10.1080/10400435.2007.10131866

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Assist Technol        ISSN: 1040-0435


  7 in total

1.  Locally manufactured wheelchairs in Tanzania - are users satisfied?

Authors:  Seyi Amosun; Aston Ndosi; Helen Buchanan
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 0.927

2.  Is any wheelchair better than no wheelchair? A Zimbabwean perspective.

Authors:  Surona Visagie; Tecla Mlambo; Judith van der Veen; Clement Nhunzvi; Deborah Tigere; Elsje Scheffler
Journal:  Afr J Disabil       Date:  2015-11-20

3.  Impact of structured wheelchair services on satisfaction and function of wheelchair users in Zimbabwe.

Authors:  Surona Visagie; Tecla Mlambo; Judith van der Veen; Clement Nhunzvi; Deborah Tigere; Elsje Scheffler
Journal:  Afr J Disabil       Date:  2016-06-10

4.  Characterizing the community use of an ultralight wheelchair with "on the fly" adjustable seating functions: A pilot study.

Authors:  Johanne Mattie; Jaimie Borisoff; William C Miller; Borna Noureddin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Exploring the impact of wheelchair design on user function in a rural South African setting.

Authors:  Surona Visagie; Svenje Duffield; Mariaan Unger
Journal:  Afr J Disabil       Date:  2015-06-26

Review 6.  Development of a wheelchair mobility skills test for children and adolescents: combining evidence with clinical expertise.

Authors:  Marleen Elisabeth Sol; Olaf Verschuren; Laura de Groot; Janke Frederike de Groot
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 2.125

7.  Development of Wheeled Mobility indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: SCI-High Project.

Authors:  Mark T Bayley; R Lee Kirby; Farnoosh Farahani; Laura Titus; Cher Smith; François Routhier; Dany H Gagnon; Patricia Stapleford; S Mohammad Alavinia; B Catharine Craven
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.985

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.