Literature DB >> 1772679

The influence of age on the durability of Carpentier-Edwards biological valves. Thirteen years follow-up.

N al-Khaja1, A Belboul, M Rashid, A el-Gatit, D Roberts, S Larsson, G William-Olsson.   

Abstract

Two hundred and ninety-nine patients received 325 Carpentier-Edwards biological valves from April 1976 to April 1982. Valves were placed in the following positions: 150 aortic (AVR), 120 mitral (MVR), 26 multiple (MR), 2 pulmonary (PR) and 1 tricuspid (TR). The mean age was 54.7 years. The total follow-up time was 2545 patient-years. Patients were divided into different age groups: less than 40, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69 and greater than 70 years and were followed-up for reoperations and tissue failure. Ninety-three operations were performed in 91 patients (30.5%) for valve related dysfunctions. The main cause of reoperation was primary tissue failure (85%). The respective incidence and risk of reoperation in the different age groups were 51.5% and 5%, 41.5% and 4%, 32% and 3%, 18% and 2.5%, and 0% for greater than 70 years of age. The risk of reoperation decreased significantly with increasing age (P less than 0.05). The respective incidence and risk of tissue failure in the age groups were 43.8% and 4.1%, 35% and 4%, 27.3% and 3.2%, and 17.2%, 2.4% and 0%. The freedom from reoperation and tissue failure was significantly higher in the older patient (greater than 60 years) compared to the younger patients (less than 60 years). The commonest cause of failure in young patients was calcification, while in older patients it was cusp rupture. Comparing aortic and mitral bioprostheses in the different age groups showed no difference between these valves in patients less than 50 years of age.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1772679     DOI: 10.1016/1010-7940(91)90119-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  5 in total

1.  A single center's experience with the Ross procedure in pediatrics.

Authors:  Edward Kirkpatrick; Roger Hurwitz; John Brown
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  Aortic biological valve prosthesis in patients younger than 65 years of age: transition to a flexible age limit?

Authors:  Lars Niclauss; Ludwig Karl von Segesser; Enrico Ferrari
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-01-03

Review 3.  What is the proper place of the Ross procedure in our modern armamentarium?

Authors:  Duke E Cameron; Luca A Vricella
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Pulmonary autograft aortic valve replacement. Early experience with the Ross procedure.

Authors:  A S Kumar; P N Rao; A K Dharmapuram; H Chander; H Trehan
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1995

5.  Ross operation in children and young adults: the Alder Hey case series.

Authors:  Shahzad Gull Raja; Marco Pozzi
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 2.298

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.