Literature DB >> 17726393

Scientific societies and promotion of the responsible conduct of research: codes, policies, and education.

Francis L Macrina1.   

Abstract

Scientific societies have a significant opportunity to contribute to the promotion of responsible conduct of research (RCR) and to RCR education. The degree to which societies engage such opportunity spans a broad range. There are three principal ways RCR may be promoted by scientific societies. The first is through codes of conduct encouraging their membership to practice ethical research according to the tenets of these codes. The second is through specialized policies (e.g., publication practices) developed by scientific societies that help define normative behavior. Finally, societies have a role to play in creating materials and resources aimed at educating scientists and trainees in matters pertaining to proper research conduct. This article illustrates examples of each of these activities embraced by different scientific societies. The American Society for Microbiology is used as a specific example of a society that has been proactive in each of these three areas. Scientific societies need to recognize the impact they can have on promoting RCR and to expand their efforts in these three and other relevant areas. The examples provided demonstrate the components of a model for all scientific societies to follow in promoting RCR.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17726393     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7e58

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  6 in total

1.  Teaching and Assessing the Responsible Conduct of Research: A Delphi Consensus Panel Report.

Authors:  James M Dubois; Jeffrey M Dueker
Journal:  J Res Adm       Date:  2009

2.  The Role of Culture and Acculturation in Researchers' Perceptions of Rules in Science.

Authors:  Alison L Antes; Tammy English; Kari A Baldwin; James M DuBois
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Factors that Affect Integrity of Authorship of Scientific Meeting Abstracts.

Authors:  John Lynch; Jane E Strasser; Christopher J Lindsell; Joel Tsevat
Journal:  AJOB Prim Res       Date:  2013

4.  Authorship Issues and Conflict in the U.S. Academic Chemical Community.

Authors:  Jeffrey I Seeman; Mark C House
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Policies and initiatives aimed at addressing research misconduct in high-income countries.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Zubin Master
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 11.069

6.  Should We All be Scientists? Re-thinking Laboratory Research as a Calling.

Authors:  Louise Bezuidenhout; Nathaniel A Warne
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.525

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.