OBJECTIVE: To report pharmacokinetic alterations and optimal dosing of piperacillin/tazobactam in an obese patient. CASE SUMMARY: A 39-year-old morbidly obese (weight 167 kg, body mass index 50 kg/m2) man was treated with piperacillin/tazobactam 3.375 g every 4 hours for recurrent cellulitis. The wound culture grew Groups A and B Streptococcus and rare Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Blood samples were obtained at steady-state from a peripheral venous catheter at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours after the start of the infusion. Population pharmacokinetics were generated from a previously published data set. The serum concentrations of piperacillin/tazobactam obtained in the patient were compared with the 95% confidence interval from the representative population. Pharmacokinetic parameters such as maximal serum concentration, minimal serum concentration, average steady-state concentration, half-life, elimination rate constant, volume of distribution (V(d)), clearance, area under the curve at steadystate, and percent of time greater than the minimum inhibitory concentration (%t>MIC) were calculated and qualitatively compared between the sample and the population. DISCUSSION: Substantial differences were noted in both the absolute values at the times of sample collection and the overall concentration-versus-time profile of both compounds. The morbidly obese individual compared with the population demonstrated a reduced average serum steady-state concentration: 39.8 mg/L versus 123.6 mg/L, an increased V(d): 54.3 L versus 12.7 L, and an increased half-life: 1.4 hours versus 0.6 hours, respectively. The %t >MIC of piperacillin for the patient, assuming MICs of 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, and 128 mg/L, was 100%, 100%, 90.9%, 55.4%, 19.9%, 0%, and 0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pathogens with elevated MICs may require altered dosing schemes with piperacillin/tazobactam. Future studies are warranted to assess increased dosages, more frequent dosing intervals, or continuous infusion dosing schemes for obese individuals with serious infections.
OBJECTIVE: To report pharmacokinetic alterations and optimal dosing of piperacillin/tazobactam in an obesepatient. CASE SUMMARY: A 39-year-old morbidly obese (weight 167 kg, body mass index 50 kg/m2) man was treated with piperacillin/tazobactam 3.375 g every 4 hours for recurrent cellulitis. The wound culture grew Groups A and B Streptococcus and rare Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Blood samples were obtained at steady-state from a peripheral venous catheter at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours after the start of the infusion. Population pharmacokinetics were generated from a previously published data set. The serum concentrations of piperacillin/tazobactam obtained in the patient were compared with the 95% confidence interval from the representative population. Pharmacokinetic parameters such as maximal serum concentration, minimal serum concentration, average steady-state concentration, half-life, elimination rate constant, volume of distribution (V(d)), clearance, area under the curve at steadystate, and percent of time greater than the minimum inhibitory concentration (%t>MIC) were calculated and qualitatively compared between the sample and the population. DISCUSSION: Substantial differences were noted in both the absolute values at the times of sample collection and the overall concentration-versus-time profile of both compounds. The morbidly obese individual compared with the population demonstrated a reduced average serum steady-state concentration: 39.8 mg/L versus 123.6 mg/L, an increased V(d): 54.3 L versus 12.7 L, and an increased half-life: 1.4 hours versus 0.6 hours, respectively. The %t >MIC of piperacillin for the patient, assuming MICs of 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, and 128 mg/L, was 100%, 100%, 90.9%, 55.4%, 19.9%, 0%, and 0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pathogens with elevated MICs may require altered dosing schemes with piperacillin/tazobactam. Future studies are warranted to assess increased dosages, more frequent dosing intervals, or continuous infusion dosing schemes for obese individuals with serious infections.
Authors: Teena Chopra; Jing J Zhao; George Alangaden; Michael H Wood; Keith S Kaye Journal: Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 2.217
Authors: Zachary C Dietch; Therese M Duane; Charles H Cook; Patrick J O'Neill; Reza Askari; Lena M Napolitano; Nicholas Namias; Christopher M Watson; Daniel L Dent; Brandy L Edwards; Puja M Shah; Christopher A Guidry; Stephen W Davies; Rhett N Willis; Robert G Sawyer Journal: Surg Infect (Larchmt) Date: 2016-03-30 Impact factor: 2.150
Authors: John J Veillette; S Alexander Winans; Victoria K Maskiewicz; James Truong; Ronald N Jones; Steven C Forland Journal: Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet Date: 2021-03-20 Impact factor: 2.569
Authors: M Hites; F S Taccone; F Wolff; E Maillart; M Beumier; R Surin; F Cotton; F Jacobs Journal: Nutr Diabetes Date: 2014-06-23 Impact factor: 5.097