Literature DB >> 17725938

Preliminary experience comparing routine cytology results with the composite results of digital image analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization in patients undergoing EUS-guided FNA.

Michael J Levy1, Jonathan E Clain, Amy Clayton, Kevin C Halling, Benjamin R Kipp, Elizabeth Rajan, Lewis R Roberts, Renee M Root, Thomas J Sebo, Mark D Topazian, Kenneth K Wang, Maurits J Wiersema, Gregory J Gores.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies indicate enhanced diagnostic accuracy for digital image analysis (DIA) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) versus routine cytology examination (RC) when biliary strictures are evaluated. These tumor markers have not been applied to EUS-guided FNA.
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine the accuracy of RC versus the composite results of DIA/FISH.
DESIGN: Patients enrolled with known or suspected malignancy. The final diagnosis was based on strict cytopathologic and imaging criteria and 12-month follow-up. SETTINGS: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: A total of 39 patients were enrolled in whom each diagnostic test was performed on samples from 42 sites to evaluate lymphadenopathy (n=19), pancreatic mass (n=19), esophageal or gastric wall mass (n=3), and thyroid mass (n=1).
INTERVENTIONS: EUS-guided FNA with RC, DIA, and FISH. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Diagnostic accuracy of RC, DIA, and FISH.
RESULTS: Malignancy was diagnosed in 30 of 42 patients, including esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, esophageal adenocarcinoma, gastric adenocarcinoma, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasia, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia, metastatic forearm sarcoma, small cell and non-small cell lung cancer, thyroid carcinoma, malignant GI stromal tumor, melanoma, adenocarcinoma of unknown primary, and lymphoma. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of DIA/FISH versus RC for detecting malignancy were 97%, 100%, and 98% versus 87%, 100%, and 90%, respectively. LIMITATIONS: Single-center pilot study.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that DIA and FISH processing of EUS-guided FNA specimens provides higher diagnostic accuracy than RC does. These data suggest that these tumor markers incorporate generic targets as suggested by the high diagnostic sensitivity in this patient cohort with diverse pathologic conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17725938     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.03.1053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  9 in total

Review 1.  Management of mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas.

Authors:  Mario Testini; Angela Gurrado; Germana Lissidini; Pietro Venezia; Luigi Greco; Giuseppe Piccinni
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  A new endoscopic ultrasonography image processing method to evaluate the prognosis for pancreatic cancer treated with interstitial brachytherapy.

Authors:  Wei Xu; Yan Liu; Zheng Lu; Zhen-Dong Jin; Yu-Hong Hu; Jian-Guo Yu; Zhao-Shen Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Lawrence Mj Best; Vishal Rawji; Stephen P Pereira; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-17

4.  Detection of IGF2BP3, HOXB7, and NEK2 mRNA expression in brush cytology specimens as a new diagnostic tool in patients with biliary strictures.

Authors:  Hans Dieter Nischalke; Volker Schmitz; Carolin Luda; Katharina Aldenhoff; Cordula Berger; Georg Feldmann; Tilman Sauerbruch; Ulrich Spengler; Jacob Nattermann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Primary malignant melanoma of the esophagus treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection: A case report.

Authors:  Mei Wang; Jianping Chen; Kewen Sun; Yun Zhuang; Fu Xu; Bin Xu; Hongyu Zhang; Qing Li; Dachuan Zhang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  A prospective comparison of conventional cytology and digital image analysis for the identification of pancreatic malignancy in patients undergoing EUS-FNA.

Authors:  Fanyang Kong; Xiangyu Kong; Jianwei Zhu; Tao Sun; Yiqi Du; Kaixuan Wang; Zhendong Jin; Zhaoshen Li; Dong Wang
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.628

7.  Detection of cytogenetic changes and chromosomal aneuploidy with fluorescent in situ hybridization in cytological specimens of oral cancers in Fanconi anemia-Proof of concept.

Authors:  Bruno Eduardo Silva de Araujo; Eunike Velleuer; Ralf Dietrich; Natalia Pomjanski; Isabela Karoline de Santana Almeida Araujo; Martin Schlensog; Susanne Irmtraud Wells; Josephine Christine Dorsman; Martin Schramm
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2021-12-02

8.  An Investigation on the Results of Cytopathologic Tests of Pancreatobiliary System Performed in the Pathology Department in Iran.

Authors:  Afshin Moradi; Amir Sadeghi; Hamid Asadzadeh Aghdaei; Tahmineh Mollasharifi; Mahsa Ahadi; Elena Jamali; Afsoon Taghavi; Nasim Foroozandeh Shahraki; Arsham Moradi
Journal:  Iran J Pathol       Date:  2021-05-05

9.  Refined pancreatobiliary UroVysion criteria and an approach for further optimization.

Authors:  Daniel Mettman; Azhar Saeed; Janna Shold; Raquele Laury; Andrew Ly; Irfan Khan; Shivani Golem; Mojtaba Olyaee; Maura O'Neil
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 4.452

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.