Literature DB >> 17725625

Independent evolution of complex life history adaptations in two families of fishes, live-bearing halfbeaks (zenarchopteridae, beloniformes) and poeciliidae (cyprinodontiformes).

David Reznick1, Robert Meredith, Bruce B Collette.   

Abstract

We have previously documented multiple, independent origins of placentas in the fish family Poeciliidae. Here we summarize similar analyses of fishes in the family Zenarchopteridae. This family includes three live-bearing genera. Earlier studies documented the presence of superfetation, or the ability to carry multiple litters of young in different stages of development in the same ovary, in some species in all three genera. There is also one earlier report of matrotrophy, or extensive postfertilization maternal provisioning, in two of these genera. We present detailed life-history data for approximately half of the species in all three genera and combine them with the best available phylogeny to make inferences about the pattern of life-history evolution within this family. Three species of Hemirhamphodon have superfetation but lack matrotrophy. Most species in Nomorhamphus and Dermogenys either lack superfetation and matrotrophy or have both superfetation and matrotrophy. Our phylogenetic analysis shows that matrotrophy may have evolved independently in each genus. In Dermogenys, matrotrophic species produce fewer, larger offspring than nonmatrotrophic species. In Nomorhamphus; matrotrophic species instead produce more and smaller offspring than lecithotrophic species. However, the matrotrophic species in both genera have significantly smaller masses of reproductive tissue relative to their body sizes. All aspects of these results are duplicated in the fish family Poeciliidae. We discuss the possible adaptive significance of matrotrophy in the light of these new results. The two families together present a remarkable opportunity to study the evolution of a complex trait because they contain multiple, independent origins of the trait that often include close relatives that vary in either the presence or absence of the matrotrophy or in the degree to which matrotrophy is developed. These are the raw materials that are required for either an analysis of the adaptive significance of the trait or for studies of the genetic mechanisms that underlie the evolution of the trait.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17725625     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00207.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  12 in total

Review 1.  Matrotrophy and placentation in invertebrates: a new paradigm.

Authors:  Andrew N Ostrovsky; Scott Lidgard; Dennis P Gordon; Thomas Schwaha; Grigory Genikhovich; Alexander V Ereskovsky
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2015-04-29

2.  How fish eggs are preadapted for the evolution of matrotrophy.

Authors:  Keenan R Morrison; Vyvian Ngo; Richard A Cardullo; David N Reznick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Superfetation reduces the negative effects of pregnancy on the fast-start escape performance in live-bearing fish.

Authors:  Mike Fleuren; Johan L van Leeuwen; Bart J A Pollux
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Have superfetation and matrotrophy facilitated the evolution of larger offspring in poeciliid fishes?

Authors:  Claudia Olivera-Tlahuel; Alison G Ossip-Klein; Héctor S Espinosa-Pérez; J Jaime Zúñiga-Vega
Journal:  Biol J Linn Soc Lond       Date:  2015-09-06       Impact factor: 2.138

5.  Spatial and temporal variation in superfoetation and related life history traits of two viviparous fishes: Poeciliopsis gracilis and P. infans.

Authors:  Patricia Frías-Alvarez; Constantino Macías Garcia; Luis F Vázquez-Vega; J Jaime Zúñiga-Vega
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2014-10-05

6.  Superfetation in live-bearing fishes is not always the result of a morphological constraint.

Authors:  Patricia Frías-Alvarez; J Jaime Zúñiga-Vega
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  How maternal investment varies with environmental factors and the age and physiological state of wild tsetse Glossina pallidipes and Glossina morsitans morsitans.

Authors:  John W Hargrove; M Odwell Muzari; Sinead English
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  An Intact Retroviral Gene Conserved in Spiny-Rayed Fishes for over 100 My.

Authors:  Jamie E Henzy; Robert J Gifford; Christopher P Kenaley; Welkin E Johnson
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Why do placentas evolve? Evidence for a morphological advantage during pregnancy in live-bearing fish.

Authors:  Mike Fleuren; Elsa M Quicazan-Rubio; Johan L van Leeuwen; Bart J A Pollux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  From incipient to substantial: evolution of placentotrophy in a phylum of aquatic colonial invertebrates.

Authors:  Andrew N Ostrovsky
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.