Literature DB >> 17725477

Loss of proprioception or motor control is not related to functional ankle instability: an observational study.

Marcos de Noronha1, Kathryn M Refshauge, Sharon L Kilbreath, Jack Crosbie.   

Abstract

QUESTIONS: Is loss of proprioception or loss of motor control related to functional ankle instability? Are proprioception and motor control related? Is there any difference in proprioception or motor control between ankles with different severity of functional ankle instability?
DESIGN: Cross-sectional, observational study. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty people aged between 18 and 40 years with functional ankle instability associated with a history of ankle sprain more than one month prior. Twenty age-matched controls with no functional ankle instability or history of ankle sprain. OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional ankle instability was classified using the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool, proprioception at the ankle was measured as movement detection at three velocities, and motor control was measured using the Landing Test and the Hopping Test.
RESULTS: There was little if any relation between proprioception (r = 0.14 to 0.03, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.25) or motor control (r = 0.08 to 0.07, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.20) and functional ankle instability. There was also little if any relation between proprioception and motor control except for a low correlation between movement detection at 0.1 deg/s and the Landing Test (r = 0.35, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.58). Furthermore, there was no difference between the ankles with or without functional ankle instability in proprioception or motor control.
CONCLUSION: By greater than one month after ankle sprain, loss of proprioception does not make a major contribution to functional ankle instability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17725477     DOI: 10.1016/s0004-9514(07)70027-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust J Physiother        ISSN: 0004-9514


  6 in total

Review 1.  Neuromuscular control and rehabilitation of the unstable ankle.

Authors:  You-Jou Hung
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-06-18

2.  Bilateral Proprioceptive Evaluation in Individuals With Unilateral Chronic Ankle Instability.

Authors:  Andreia S P Sousa; João Leite; Bianca Costa; Rubim Santos
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT): an instrument to assess unilateral chronic ankle instability.

Authors:  David Cruz-Díaz; Fidel Hita-Contreras; Rafael Lomas-Vega; M C Osuna-Pérez; Antonio Martínez-Amat
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Ankle instability effects on joint position sense when stepping across the active movement extent discrimination apparatus.

Authors:  Jeremy Witchalls; Gordon Waddington; Peter Blanch; Roger Adams
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Extrinsic visual feedback and additional cognitive/physical demands affect single-limb balance control in individuals with ankle instability.

Authors:  You-Jou Hung; Jacob Miller
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-12-18

6.  Reliability and Recalibration of the Persian Version of Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool Cut-off Score in Athletes with Functional Ankle Instability.

Authors:  Maryam Mirshahi; Farzin Halabchi; Mohammadreza Golbakhsh; Soheil Saadat
Journal:  Adv J Emerg Med       Date:  2019-06-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.