Literature DB >> 17724109

Using focus groups to improve the validity of cross-national survey research: a study of physician decision making.

Amy B O'Donnell1, Karen E Lutfey, Lisa D Marceau, John B McKinlay.   

Abstract

In this article, the authors demonstrate how qualitative methods can form a foundation for quantitative research by improving instrument validity, informing the data collection process, and improving cost-effectiveness in a study of physician decision making. To test terminology, applicability, and comprehension of a quantitative questionnaire for doctors in the United States and United Kingdom, each country's researchers conducted physician focus groups with questions organized around the experiment, including (a) validity of video vignettes of actor "patients," (b) population accessibility, (c) level of remuneration, (d) appropriate endorsement figure, and (e) question comprehension. Focus group data collected during instrument development and fieldwork planning streamlined processes and achieved cost efficiencies and effectiveness for the overall study. Beyond simply adding a post hoc qualitative component to an already free-standing quantitative methodology, focus groups were used in the study formulation, where the qualitative methodology was integrated into the process of developing a valid survey instrument.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17724109     DOI: 10.1177/1049732307305257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Res        ISSN: 1049-7323


  6 in total

1.  Examination of the reliability and validity of the Mindful Eating Questionnaire in pregnant women.

Authors:  John W Apolzan; Candice A Myers; Amanda D Cowley; Heather Brady; Daniel S Hsia; Tiffany M Stewart; Leanne M Redman; Corby K Martin
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 3.868

2.  Eliciting views on antibiotic prescribing and resistance among hospital and outpatient care physicians in Berlin, Germany: results of a qualitative study.

Authors:  Edward Velasco; Antina Ziegelmann; Tim Eckmanns; Gérard Krause
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 3.  Self-management: a systematic review of outcome measures adopted in self-management interventions for stroke.

Authors:  Emma J Boger; Sara Demain; Sue Latter
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.033

4.  The use of focus groups to develop a culturally relevant quality of life tool for lymphatic filariasis in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Lynne Zeldenryk; Marion Gray; Susan Gordon; Rick Speare; Moazzem Hossain
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Supporting Staff in Southern Family Planning Clinics: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Anna Newton-Levinson; Megan Higdon; Roger Rochat
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2022-01-08

6.  Scanning for satisfaction or digging for dismay? Comparing findings from a postal survey with those from a focus group-study.

Authors:  Benedicte Carlsen; Claire Glenton
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 4.615

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.