| Literature DB >> 17724039 |
Edmund J Lamb1, Alex Hodsman, Dirk van Schalkwyk, David Ansell, Graham Warwick.
Abstract
In the UK, there is a continuing year-on-year trend towards improvement in serum phosphate control in dialysis patients although overall it still remains poor. The Renal Association (RA) target (<1.8 mmol/l) was achieved in 65% of patients overall, (71% of peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, 63% of haemo dialysis (HD) patients). Seventy-six percent of UK dialysis patients achieve a corrected calcium concentration within the RA target range. As with serum phosphate, there is a trend of continuing year-on-year improvement. Nearly two-thirds (69%) of patients achieve a calcium x phosphate product within the KDOQI guidelines (<4.4 mmol(2)/l(2)): again, achievement seems to have improved year-on-year. Control was better in PD patients compared with HD patients (73% vs 67% achieving the standard). There remains large between-centre variation in the ability of renal centres to achieve the UK RA target for plasma parathyroid hormone (PTH). As seen in previous years, overall achievement was poor (median 63%, range 47-92% compliance with the standard). Most transplant patients achieve good phosphate and calcium control (99%, range 95-100%) and the percentage of patients achieving serum calcium concentrations within the target range was 84% (range 43-97%). Nearly all (99%) of transplant patients achieved calcium x phosphate product concentrations within the KDOQI target range. There would appear to be wide variation in clinical practice with respect to aluminium monitoring with a suggestion that few centres are following current UK, RA guidelines. Overall in the UK, 83% of HD, 70% of PD and 62% of transplant patients achieve a total cholesterol concentration <5 mmol/l. The percentage of patients with cholesterol <5 mmol/l has increased significantly year-on-year in all three modalities.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17724039 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfm405
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant ISSN: 0931-0509 Impact factor: 5.992