Literature DB >> 17722762

The fate of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in the wastewater treatment process and its importance in the removal of wastewater contaminants.

Athanasios Katsoyiannis1, Constantini Samara.   

Abstract

GOAL, SCOPE AND
BACKGROUND: Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) constitutes a parameter of organic pollution for waters and wastewaters, which is not so often studied, and it is not yet regulated by directives. The term 'DOC' is used for the fraction of organics that pass through a 0.45 microm pores' size membrane. The type of wastewater plays an important role in the quality of DOC and it has been shown that DOC may contain aquatic humic substances, hydrophobic bases, hydrophobic neutrals, hydrophilic acids, hydrophilic bases and hydrophilic neutrals. The quality of the DOC is expected to affect its fate in a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP), since a considerable fraction of DOC is not biodegradable, and it may be released in the aquatic environment together with the treated effluent. In the present study, the occurrence of DOC during the wastewater treatment process is investigated and its removal rates during primary, secondary and overall treatment are being estimated. Furthermore, a correlation is being attempted between DOC and the concentrations of selected Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) and Heavy Metals (HMs) in the dissolved phase of wastewaters, to examine whether there are common sources for these pollution parameters in WWTPs. Also, DOC is being correlated with the partition coefficients of the above-mentioned pollutants in wastewater, in order to examine the effect of 'solubility enhancement' in WWTPs and to evaluate the result of this phenomenon in the efficiency of a WWTP to remove organic pollutants.
METHODS: For the purposes of this study, 24-h composite wastewater samples were collected from the influent (raw wastewater, RW), the effluent of primary sedimentation tank (primary sedimentation effluent, PSE) and the effluent of secondary sedimentation tank (secondary sedimentation effluent, SSE). Samples were analyzed for the presence of 26 POPs (7 PCBs and 19 organochlorine pesticides), 8 HMs and DOC. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Mean concentrations of DOC in RW and PSE were at similar levels (approximately 70 mg l(-1)), suggesting that primary treatment has a minor effect on the DOC content of wastewater. DOC concentrations in SSE were significantly lower (approximately 19 mg l(-1)) as a result of the degradation of organic compounds in the biological reactor. Calculated removals of DOC were 0.8% in the primary treatment, 63% in the secondary treatment, and 69% in the overall treatment, exhibiting large differences from other organic pollution parameters, such as BOD and COD. The overall DOC removal was found to be independent from the DOC concentration in raw wastewater. Poor correlation was also observed between the DOC content and the concentrations of wastewater contaminants, such as persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and heavy metals (HMs), probably suggesting that their occurrence in WWTPs is due to different sources. A good negative linear relationship was revealed between DOC concentrations and the logarithms of the distribution coefficients (Kd) of various POPs and HMs between the solid and the liquid phases of wastewater. This relationship suggests that DOC facilitates hydrophobic pollutants to remain in the dissolved phase thus causing lower removal percentages during the treatment process.
CONCLUSION: DOC was measured at three stages of a municipal WWTP that receives mainly domestic wastewater and urban runoff. DOC concentrations in untreated and primarily treated wastewater were almost equal, and only after the secondary sedimentation there was a decrease. Concentrations and removal rates of DOC were in the same levels as in other WWTPs that receive municipal wastewater. The origin of DOC was found to be different to the one of POPs and of HMs, as no correlation was observed between the concentrations of DOC and the concentrations of these pollutants. On the contrary, DOC was found to have significant negative correlation with the Kd of all pollutants examined, suggesting that it plays an important role in the partitioning of those pollutants between the dissolved and the sorbed phase of wastewaters. This effect of DOC on partitioning can affect the ability of WWTPs to remove toxic pollutants, and that way it facilitates the discharge of those chemicals in the aquatic ecosystems together with the treated effluent. RRECOMMENDATION:By the results of this work it is shown that the presence of DOC in wastewaters can significantly affect the partition of hazardous pollutants between the dissolved and the sorbed phase. It is therefore of importance that this parameter is controlled more in wastewaters, since it can cause a decrease in the efficiency of WWTPs to remove quantitatively persistent pollutants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17722762     DOI: 10.1065/espr2006.05.302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  17 in total

1.  Quantification of the dissolved organic matter effect on the sorption of hydrophobic organic pollutant: application of an overall mechanistic sorption model

Authors: 
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.086

2.  The fate of xenobiotic organic compounds in wastewater treatment plants.

Authors:  G Byrns
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 11.236

3.  DOC removal by multi-stage ozonation-biological treatment.

Authors:  Wataru Nishijima; Tsukasa Mukaidani; Mitsumasa Okada
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 11.236

4.  Effect of a heavy metal model mixture on biological parameters of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss.

Authors:  Milda Zita Vosyliene; Nijole Kazlauskiene; Gintaras Svecevicius
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Persistent organic pollutants (POPs): state of the science.

Authors:  K C Jones; P de Voogt
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 8.071

6.  The effect of export to the deep sea on the long-range transport potential of persistent organic pollutants.

Authors:  Martin Scheringer; Maximilian Stroebe; Frank Wania; Fabio Wegmann; Konrad Hungerbühler
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Characterization of isolated fractions of dissolved organic matter from natural waters and a wastewater effluent.

Authors:  H Ma; H E Allen; Y Yin
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 11.236

8.  Characterization of dissolved organic matter in effluents from wastewater treatment plants.

Authors:  Akio Imai; Takehiko Fukushima; Kazuo Matsushige; Yong-Hwan Kim; Kwangsoon Choi
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 11.236

9.  Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in the sewage treatment plant of Thessaloniki, northern Greece: occurrence and removal.

Authors:  Athanasios Katsoyiannis; Constantini Samara
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 11.236

10.  Estimating DOC regime in a wastewater treatment plant by UV deconvolution.

Authors:  A Escalas; M Droguet; J M Guadayol; J Caixach
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 11.236

View more
  5 in total

1.  Thermodynamic entropy of organic oxidation in the water environment: experimental evaluation compared to semi-empirical calculation.

Authors:  Li Luo; Xiaochang C Wang; Huu Hao Ngo; Wenshan Guo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Stress-related gene expression changes in rainbow trout hepatocytes exposed to various municipal wastewater treatment influents and effluents.

Authors:  F Gagné; S A Smyth; C André; M Douville; M Gélinas; K Barclay
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Polyvinyl Chloride Microplastics Leach Phthalates into the Aquatic Environment over Decades.

Authors:  Charlotte Henkel; Thorsten Hüffer; Thilo Hofmann
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 11.357

4.  Anthropogenic gadolinium anomalies and rare earth elements in the water of Atibaia River and Anhumas Creek, Southeast Brazil.

Authors:  Francisco Ferreira de Campos; Jacinta Enzweiler
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Dioxins, furans and PCBs in recycled water for indirect potable reuse.

Authors:  Clemencia Rodriguez; Angus Cook; Brian Devine; Paul Van Buynder; Richard Lugg; Kathryn Linge; Philip Weinstein
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.