Literature DB >> 1772264

The effects of high parity and socioeconomic status on obstetric and neonatal outcome.

D S Seidman1, S Dollberg, D K Stevenson, R Gale.   

Abstract

We studied the interaction of social status and high parity in 15,102 consecutive births in one inner-city hospital, of which 1874 (12.4%) occurred in mothers who had given birth to seven or more infants (Grand multiparae). Group 1 consisted of 1258 grand multiparae from a socioeconomically stable and homogeneous ultra-orthodox Jewish community in Jerusalem, and group 2, included all other grand multiparae of relatively greater age and lower socioeconomic status. A significantly higher rate of small for gestational age, low birth weight and preterm infants was found in group 2 compared with group 1. The results suggest that grand multiparity is not of itself a risk factor, but reflects the confounding effect of environmental conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1772264     DOI: 10.1007/bf02391578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  21 in total

1.  Grand multiparity--its obstetric implications.

Authors:  H A ZIEL
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1962-12-01       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Observations on some patients of high parity delivering in a general hospital in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  A A Opaneye
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.561

3.  Grand multiparity: an obstetric or neonatal risk factor?

Authors:  D S Seidman; Y Armon; D Roll; D K Stevenson; R Gale
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  The grandmultipara: is she still a risk?

Authors:  A I Eidelman; R Kamar; M S Schimmel; E Bar-On
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Disproportion in the multipara, fact or philosophy.

Authors:  S Duckman; W Chen; T Gungon; F Bonura
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1968-08-01       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  The problem of grandmultiparity in current obstetric practice.

Authors:  F T Mwambingu; A A Al Meshari; A Akiel
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.561

7.  The "grand multipara"--is it a problem? A review of 5785 cases.

Authors:  K Fuchs; B A Peretz; R Marcovici; E Paldi; I Timor-Tritsh
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 3.561

8.  The Jerusalem perinatal study: the first decade 1964--73.

Authors:  S Harlap; A M Davies; N B Grover; R Prywes
Journal:  Isr J Med Sci       Date:  1977-11

9.  Pregnancy and labor of grand multiparous Sudanese women.

Authors:  F A Aziz
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1980 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.561

10.  The obstetric performance of the grand multipara.

Authors:  A Chang; P Larkin; E J Esler; R Condie; J Morrison
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1977-03-05       Impact factor: 7.738

View more
  2 in total

1.  The associations of parity and maternal age with small-for-gestational-age, preterm, and neonatal and infant mortality: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Naoko Kozuki; Anne C C Lee; Mariangela F Silveira; Ayesha Sania; Joshua P Vogel; Linda Adair; Fernando Barros; Laura E Caulfield; Parul Christian; Wafaie Fawzi; Jean Humphrey; Lieven Huybregts; Aroonsri Mongkolchati; Robert Ntozini; David Osrin; Dominique Roberfroid; James Tielsch; Anjana Vaidya; Robert E Black; Joanne Katz
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Grand multiparity and the possible risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes: a dilemma to be deciphered.

Authors:  Ghadeer K Al-Shaikh; Gehan H Ibrahim; Amel A Fayed; Hazem Al-Mandeel
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 3.007

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.