This report presents a new and simple methodology for the synthesis of multicomponent peptide vaccines, named the peptide crosslinked micelles (PCMs). The PCMs are core shell micelles designed to deliver peptide antigens and immunostimulatory DNA to antigen-presenting cells (APCs). They are composed of immunostimulatory DNA, peptide antigen, and a thiopyridal derived poly(ethylene glycol)-polylysine block copolymer. The peptide antigen acts as a crosslinker in the PCM strategy, which allows the peptide antigen to be efficiently encapsulated into the PCMs and also stabilizes them against degradation by serum components. Cell culture studies demonstrated that the PCMs greatly enhance the uptake of peptide antigens into human dendritic cells.
This report presents a new and simple methodology for the synthesis of multicomponent peptide vaccines, named the peptide crosslinked micelles (PCMs). The PCMs are core shell micelles designed to deliver peptide antigens and immunostimulatory DNA to antigen-presenting cells (APCs). They are composed of immunostimulatory DNA, peptide antigen, and a thiopyridal derived poly(ethylene glycol)-polylysine block copolymer. The peptide antigen acts as a crosslinker in the PCM strategy, which allows the peptide antigen to be efficiently encapsulated into the PCMs and also stabilizes them against degradation by serum components. Cell culture studies demonstrated that the PCMs greatly enhance the uptake of peptide antigens into human dendritic cells.
Vaccines based on peptide antigens have tremendous therapeutic potential against infectious diseases and tumors, in which peptide epitopes have been defined. Peptide vaccines have been capable of generating protective immunity against infectious diseases in animal models, and numerous clinical trials with peptide vaccines are in progress (Shirai et al 1994; van Endert 2001; Hunziker et al 2002; Purcell et al 2003). However, despite their promise, the first generation of peptide vaccines has performed poorly in human clinical trials, partially due to drug delivery problems (Brander et al 1996; BenMohamed et al 2002). Delivering peptide vaccines has been challenging because they consist of multiple components, such as peptide antigens and immunostimulatory molecules. Although promising results have been obtained with peptide vaccines composed of lipid conjugates and poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) microparticles, there is still a great need for the development of new peptide vaccine delivery vehicles (Ertl et al 1996; Jackson et al 1997).In this report, a new peptide vaccine delivery vehicle is presented that is designed to simultaneously deliver peptide antigens and immunostimulatory molecules to antigen-presenting cells (APCs). They are named peptide crosslinked micelles (PCMs) and are composed of block copolymer micelles that encapsulate immunostimulatory (ISS)-DNA in their cores and are crosslinked by peptide antigens through disulfide linkages (Figure 1). The PCMs are based on the disulfide crosslinking strategy, using thiolated poly(ethylene glycol)(PEG)-peptide block copolymers, pioneered by the Kataoka (Kakizawa et al 1999; Miyata et al 2004) and Rice (Park et al 2002) laboratories for the delivery of DNA.
Figure 1
Peptide crosslinked micelle design and synthesis. Step 1: immunostimulatory (ISS)-DNA and I (PEG-PLL, poly(ethylene glycol)-poly-l-lysine) are mixed to form micelles (uncrosslinked micelle). Step 2: These micelles are then crosslinked with the peptide antigen (II) to generate a delivery system that can encapsulate both immunostimulatory molecules and peptide antigens. After phagocytosis by antigen-presenting cells (APCs), the peptide crosslinked micelles release their components.
Abbreviations: GSH, glutathione.
Peptide crosslinked micelle design and synthesis. Step 1: immunostimulatory (ISS)-DNA and I (PEG-PLL, poly(ethylene glycol)-poly-l-lysine) are mixed to form micelles (uncrosslinked micelle). Step 2: These micelles are then crosslinked with the peptide antigen (II) to generate a delivery system that can encapsulate both immunostimulatory molecules and peptide antigens. After phagocytosis by antigen-presenting cells (APCs), the peptide crosslinked micelles release their components.Abbreviations: GSH, glutathione.
Methods and results
The PCMs are synthesized by a two-step process that uses the peptide antigen as the crosslinking agent for the micelles. In the first step, the block copolymer I is self-assembled with ISS-DNA to generate core shell micelles, which have a core composed of thiopyridal groups intermixed with ISS-DNA (Figure 1). This step is based on work from the Katoaka laboratory using thiolated PEG-poly-l-lysine (PLL) block copolymers and plasmid DNA (Kakizawa et al 1999; Kakizawa et al 2001; Miyata et al 2004). In the second step these micelles are crosslinked by reaction of their thiopyridal groups with a cysteine-modified antigenic peptide to generate a disulfide crosslinked micelle that contains both peptide antigens and ISS-DNA. Thus the antigenic peptide plays a dual role in the PCMs: it acts as a crosslinker to enhance serum stability, but is also the therapeutic that needs to be delivered.Disulfide linkages are selectively reduced inside cells because of the high glutathione (GSH) concentration (10 mM intracellular GSH concentration versus 100 mM extracellular concentration) (Kakizawa et al 1999; Park et al 2002; Miyata et al 2004). Therefore, after phagocytosis, the disulfide crosslinks in the PCMs should get reduced, and encapsulated peptide antigens and ISS-DNA will be released. After release, the peptide antigens will be processed by enzymes in the APCs and presented to T cells (Craiu et al 1997), while the released ISS-DNA will induce the APCs to secrete the cytokines needed for effective T cell activation and proliferation.The block copolymer I (Figure 2) forms the scaffold of the PCMs and is composed of a PEG chain (5 kDa) connected to a poly(lysine-thiopyridal) block (degree of polymerization = 20). PEG-poly-l-lysine (PEG-PLL) block copolymers have been extensively used for the synthesis of disulfide crosslinked micelles. For example, PEG-PLL has been thiolated by the Katoaka laboratory through the reaction of PEG-PLL with either N-succinimidyl 3-(2-pyridyldithio)-propionamido (SPDP) or Trauts reagent (Kakizawa et al 2001; Miyata et al 2004). In this report we chose to synthesize the block copolymer I via a Michael addition reaction between PEG-PLL (III) (Harada et al 1995) and hydroxyl-ethyl thiopyridal acrylate (IV) (Figure 2), because it introduces a thiopyridal group onto the block copolymer while also preserving its positive charges.
Figure 2
Chemical structure and synthesis of poly(ethylene glycol)-poly-l-lysine (PEG-PLL)-thiopyridal (I).
Chemical structure and synthesis of poly(ethylene glycol)-poly-l-lysine (PEG-PLL)-thiopyridal (I).A HIV peptide vaccine was synthesized using the PCM strategy with the peptide CGCRIQRGPGRAFVTIGKCGCG (II). The peptide II comes from the glycoprotein-120 (GP-120) and contains the sequence RIQRGPGRAFVTIGK, which is both a class I and II antigen (Belyakov et al 1998; Berzofsky et al 1999). First, micelles were formed between I and ISS-DNA by mixing 0.5 mg of I with 0.1 mg of ISS-DNA (5-TCCATGACGTTCCTGACGTT-3) (charge ratio 1:15 [+/–]) in 0.5 mL of 50 mM phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Dynamic light scattering of these micelles by the cumulants method indicated that they had an average diameter of 57.0 nm. These micelles were then crosslinked by adding 0.1 mg of II to the micelles (equal molar ratio of cysteines on II to thiopyridal groups on I). The peptide II was incorporated into the micelles through a disulfide exchange reaction.The kinetics of the disulfide exchange reaction between II and the micelles were quantified by UV absorbance at 342 nm (generated from the released thiopyridone). Figure 3 demonstrates that II reacts rapidly with the micelles. At an equal molar ratio of cysteine to thiopyridal groups, more than 90% of the cysteine groups of the peptide were consumed within 20 minutes. After the peptide crosslinking, the average size of the micelles decreased to 50.0 nm.
Figure 3
Crosslinking reaction of cysteines on peptide antigen (II) with thiopyridal group in micelles.
Crosslinking reaction of cysteines on peptide antigen (II) with thiopyridal group in micelles.The stimuli-responsive release of II from the PCMs due to the presence of GSH was investigated to determine if the PCMs will release peptide antigens after phagocytosis. The PCMs were incubated with different concentrations of GSH for 24 hours in 50 mM pH 7.4 PBS buffer, and then analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to determine the release of II. Figure 4 demonstrates that the presence of GSH triggers the release of II. Incubation of the PCMs with 10 mM GSH (intracellular levels) induced the release of 71% of II, whereas incubation of the PCMs with just buffer induced the release of only 10% of II.
Figure 4
Release of peptide antigen (II) from the peptide crosslinked micelles (PCMs) in the presence of glutathione (GSH). Conditions: 50 mM phosphate buffered saline buffer (pH = 7.4), 24 hours’ incubation, room temperature.
Release of peptide antigen (II) from the peptide crosslinked micelles (PCMs) in the presence of glutathione (GSH). Conditions: 50 mM phosphate buffered saline buffer (pH = 7.4), 24 hours’ incubation, room temperature.A key advantage of the PCM strategy is that it generates a crosslinked delivery system. This crosslinking should stabilize the PCMs in vivo. For example, the Katoaka laboratory demonstrated that plasmid DNA, encapsulated in disulfide crosslinked PEG-polylysine micelles, is protected against decomposition induced by polyelectrolyte exchange reactions with charged proteins (Kakizawa et al 1999; Miyata et al 2004). The stability of the PCMs to decomposition was investigated by mixing the negatively charged polymerpoly(vinyl sulfate) (PVS) with the PCMs. This mixture was then analyzed by gel electrophoresis to determine the quantity of ISS-DNA displaced by the PVS. As a control, PVS was also incubated with uncrosslinked micelles composed of just I and ISS-DNA. Figure 5a, lane 4, demonstrates that PVS can disrupt uncrosslinked micelles composed of just ISS-DNA and I. In contrast, Figure 5a, lane 5, demonstrates that PVS cannot displace ISS-DNA from the PCMs, presumably because the peptide cross-linking prevents the PVS from diffusing into the micelles and displacing the ISS-DNA. Importantly, after incubation of the PCMs with intracellular concentrations of GSH, the PCMs release encapsulated ISS-DNA in the presence of PVS, demonstrating that the micelles should release their contents after phagocytosis (Figure 5b, lanes 2 and 3).
Figure 5
(a) Stability of peptide crosslinked micelles and (b) glutathione (GSH)-induced release of DNA from the peptide crosslinked micelles. Charge ratio of DNA to poly(ethylene glycol)-poly-l-lysine (PEG-PLL)-thiopyridal (I) is 1:15 (–/+); 1 μg of DNA was loaded in each lane; molar ratio of sulfate in poly(vinyl sulfate) (PVS) (Mw = 17000) to phosphate in DNA is 6:1; molar ratio of cysteine on peptide to thiopyridal group on I is 1:1. All samples were incubated at room temperature for 24 hours, followed by gel electrophoresis with low range ultra agarose gel in tris/acetic acid/EDTA buffer.
(a) Stability of peptide crosslinked micelles and (b) glutathione (GSH)-induced release of DNA from the peptide crosslinked micelles. Charge ratio of DNA to poly(ethylene glycol)-poly-l-lysine (PEG-PLL)-thiopyridal (I) is 1:15 (–/+); 1 μg of DNA was loaded in each lane; molar ratio of sulfate in poly(vinyl sulfate) (PVS) (Mw = 17000) to phosphate in DNA is 6:1; molar ratio of cysteine on peptide to thiopyridal group on I is 1:1. All samples were incubated at room temperature for 24 hours, followed by gel electrophoresis with low range ultra agarose gel in tris/acetic acid/EDTA buffer.The ability of the PCMs to protect encapsulated ISS-DNA from degradation by serum nucleases was also investigated. PCMs were synthesized (as described above) and incubated with 10% serum for 12 hours. These PCMs were then examined by gel electrophoresis to determine the stability of the encapsulated ISS-DNA. As a control, ISS-DNA by itself was incubated with serum. Figure 6 demonstrates that ISS-DNA, by itself, was completely hydrolyzed in 10% serum (lane 2). In contrast, ISS-DNA encapsulated in the PCMs was protected from serum nucleases, presumably because of the effects of the crosslinking (lane 3), which should prevent nucleases from entering the micelle.
Figure 6
Protection of immunostimulatory (ISS)-DNA in peptide crosslinked micelles against serum nucleases. Charge ratio of ISS-DNA to poly(ethylene glycol)-poly-l-lysine (PEG-PLL)-thiopyridal (I) is 1:15 (–/+); 1 μg of DNA was loaded in each lane; glutathione (GSH) (100 μM) was added to lane 3 to induce release of encapsulated ISS-DNA. All samples were incubated with 10% serum at room temperature for 12 hours.
Protection of immunostimulatory (ISS)-DNA in peptide crosslinked micelles against serum nucleases. Charge ratio of ISS-DNA to poly(ethylene glycol)-poly-l-lysine (PEG-PLL)-thiopyridal (I) is 1:15 (–/+); 1 μg of DNA was loaded in each lane; glutathione (GSH) (100 μM) was added to lane 3 to induce release of encapsulated ISS-DNA. All samples were incubated with 10% serum at room temperature for 12 hours.The PCMs have a size appropriate for phagocytosis by antigen-presenting cells and should therefore efficiently deliver peptide antigens into antigen-presenting cells. To investigate if the PCMs are efficiently phagocytosed by APCs, we constructed PCMs using a fluorescein (FITC)-labeled crosslinking peptide, FITC-CGSIINFEKLGCG. The PCMs were synthesized by first mixing 1.8 mg of I with 0.3 mg of ISS-DNA (charge ratio 15:1 (+/–)) in 0.5 mL of 50 mM PBS, generating micelles, which were then crosslinked by addition of 2.1 mg of FITC-CGSIINFEKLGCG. These micelles were then incubated with human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDCs), generated as previously described (Agrawal et al 2003), for 4 hours in 10% fetal calf serum (FCS)-containing media. Figure 7 demonstrates that dendritic cells incubated with PCMs containing FITC-CGSIINFEKLGCG (10 μg/ml) internalize approximately 7 times more FITC-CGSIINFEKLGCG than dendritic cells incubated only with FITC-CGSIINFEKLGCG (10 μg/ml). Thus the PCMs are capable of greatly enhancing the delivery of peptide antigens into human dendritic cells.
Figure 7
Efficient uptake of peptide crosslinked micelles (PCMs) containing fluorescein (FITC)-CGSIINFEKLGCG by human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDCs). MDDCs were pulsed with either (a) FITC-CGSIINFEKLGCG (10 g/ml) or (b) PCMs containing FITC-CGSIINFEKLGCG (10 g/ml) for 4 hours in 10% fetal calf serum (FCS)-containing media. Cells were analyzed by flow cytometry for the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of fluorescein. Results are representative of three separate experiments. The shaded region is the autofluorescence of MDDCs incubated in just plain FCS-containing media; the dark line is the fluorescence of MDDCs incubated with the fluoresceincontaining compounds.
Efficient uptake of peptide crosslinked micelles (PCMs) containing fluorescein (FITC)-CGSIINFEKLGCG by human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDCs). MDDCs were pulsed with either (a) FITC-CGSIINFEKLGCG (10 g/ml) or (b) PCMs containing FITC-CGSIINFEKLGCG (10 g/ml) for 4 hours in 10% fetal calf serum (FCS)-containing media. Cells were analyzed by flow cytometry for the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of fluorescein. Results are representative of three separate experiments. The shaded region is the autofluorescence of MDDCs incubated in just plain FCS-containing media; the dark line is the fluorescence of MDDCs incubated with the fluoresceincontaining compounds.
Conclusion
The PCM strategy is a robust and simple strategy for the development of peptide vaccine delivery vehicles. Any peptide antigen can be potentially incorporated into the PCMs; it simply has to be modified with extra cysteines. The components of the PCMs are also biodegradable and should be easily amenable for human applications. As a result, the PCMs should find numerous applications in vaccine development.
Authors: Sudhanshu Agrawal; Anshu Agrawal; Barbara Doughty; Andrew Gerwitz; John Blenis; Thomas Van Dyke; Bali Pulendran Journal: J Immunol Date: 2003-11-15 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Anthony W Purcell; Weiguang Zeng; Nicole A Mifsud; Lauren K Ely; Whitney A Macdonald; David C Jackson Journal: J Pept Sci Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 1.905
Authors: I M Belyakov; J D Ahlers; B Y Brandwein; P Earl; B L Kelsall; B Moss; W Strober; J A Berzofsky Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 1998-12-15 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: M Shirai; H Okada; M Nishioka; T Akatsuka; C Wychowski; R Houghten; C D Pendleton; S M Feinstone; J A Berzofsky Journal: J Virol Date: 1994-05 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Nitesh K Kunda; Satyanarayana Somavarapu; Stephen B Gordon; Gillian A Hutcheon; Imran Y Saleem Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2012-10-09 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: Marlena M Westcott; Elene A Clemens; Beth C Holbrook; S Bruce King; Martha A Alexander-Miller Journal: Vaccine Date: 2018-02-21 Impact factor: 3.641