Literature DB >> 17721333

Computer-aided detection (CAD) in lung cancer screening at chest MDCT: ROC analysis of CAD versus radiologist performance.

Francesco Fraioli1, Linda Bertoletti, Alessandro Napoli, Federica Pediconi, Francesca Antonella Calabrese, Raffaele Masciangelo, Carlo Catalano, Roberto Passariello.   

Abstract

To evaluate the performance of a computer-aided detection (CAD) algorithm in the detection of pulmonary nodules on high-resolution multidetector row computed tomography images in a large, homogeneous screening population, and to evaluate the effect of the system output on the performance of radiologists, using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Three radiologists with variable experience (1 to 7 y), independently read the 200 computed tomography scans and assigned each nodule candidate a confidence score (1-2-3: unlikely, probably, and definitely a nodule). CAD was applied to all scans; successively readers reevaluated all findings of the CAD, assigning, in consensus, a confidence score (1 to 3). The reference standard was established by the consensus of 2 experienced radiologists with 30 and 15 years of experience. Results were used to generate an free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis. The reference standard showed 125 nodules. Sensitivity for readers I-II-III was 57%, 68%, and 46%. A double reading resulted in an increase in sensitivity up to 75%. With CAD, sensitivity was increased to 94%, 96%, and 94% for readers I, II, and III. The area under the free-response receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) was 0.72, 0.82, 0.55, and 0.84 for readers I, II, III, and the CAD, when considering all nodules. Differences between readers I-II and CAD were not significant (P=0.9). There was a significant difference between reader III and the CAD. For nodules <6-mm Az was 0.40, 0.47, 0.14, and 0.72 for readers I, II, III, and the CAD. Differences between all readers and the CAD were significant (P<0.05). CAD can aid in daily radiologic routine detecting a substantial number of nodules unseen by radiologists. This is true for both board-certified radiologists and for less experienced readers especially in the detection of small nodules.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17721333     DOI: 10.1097/RTI.0b013e318033aae8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Imaging        ISSN: 0883-5993            Impact factor:   3.000


  10 in total

1.  Detection of noncalcified pulmonary nodules on low-dose MDCT: comparison of the sensitivity of two CAD systems by using a double reference standard.

Authors:  A R Larici; M Amato; P Ordóñez; F Maggi; L Menchini; A Caulo; L Calandriello; G Vallati; S Giunta; M Crecco; L Bonomo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 2.  CAD (computed-aided detection) and CADx (computer aided diagnosis) systems in identifying and characterising lung nodules on chest CT: overview of research, developments and new prospects.

Authors:  F Fraioli; G Serra; R Passariello
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Integration of fully automated computer-aided pulmonary nodule detection into CT pulmonary angiography studies in the emergency department: effect on workflow and diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Amirhossein Mozaffary; Tugce Agirlar Trabzonlu; Pamela Lombardi; Adeel R Seyal; Rishi Agrawal; Vahid Yaghmai
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2019-07-27

4.  Comparing the performance of trained radiographers against experienced radiologists in the UK lung cancer screening (UKLS) trial.

Authors:  Arjun Nair; Natalie Gartland; Bruce Barton; Diane Jones; Leigh Clements; Nicholas J Screaton; John A Holemans; Stephen W Duffy; John K Field; David R Baldwin; David M Hansell; Anand Devaraj
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  Lung Cancer Screening, Version 3.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Authors:  Douglas E Wood; Ella A Kazerooni; Scott L Baum; George A Eapen; David S Ettinger; Lifang Hou; David M Jackman; Donald Klippenstein; Rohit Kumar; Rudy P Lackner; Lorriana E Leard; Inga T Lennes; Ann N C Leung; Samir S Makani; Pierre P Massion; Peter Mazzone; Robert E Merritt; Bryan F Meyers; David E Midthun; Sudhakar Pipavath; Christie Pratt; Chakravarthy Reddy; Mary E Reid; Arnold J Rotter; Peter B Sachs; Matthew B Schabath; Mark L Schiebler; Betty C Tong; William D Travis; Benjamin Wei; Stephen C Yang; Kristina M Gregory; Miranda Hughes
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 11.908

6.  Efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for completely resected stage IB non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Hye Jung Park; Heae Surng Park; Yoon Jin Cha; Sungsoo Lee; Hei-Cheul Jeung; Jae Yong Cho; Hyung Jung Kim; Min Kwang Byun
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Performance of computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules in low-dose CT: comparison with double reading by nodule volume.

Authors:  Yingru Zhao; Geertruida H de Bock; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Rob J van Klaveren; Ying Wang; Luca Bogoni; Pim A de Jong; Willem P Mali; Peter M A van Ooijen; Matthijs Oudkerk
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  The impact of trained radiographers as concurrent readers on performance and reading time of experienced radiologists in the UK Lung Cancer Screening (UKLS) trial.

Authors:  Arjun Nair; Nicholas J Screaton; John A Holemans; Diane Jones; Leigh Clements; Bruce Barton; Natalie Gartland; Stephen W Duffy; David R Baldwin; John K Field; David M Hansell; Anand Devaraj
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Added value of double reading in diagnostic radiology,a systematic review.

Authors:  Håkan Geijer; Mats Geijer
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2018-03-28

10.  Evaluating the performance of a deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis (DL-CAD) system for detecting and characterizing lung nodules: Comparison with the performance of double reading by radiologists.

Authors:  Li Li; Zhou Liu; Hua Huang; Meng Lin; Dehong Luo
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2018-12-08       Impact factor: 3.500

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.