Literature DB >> 17720927

Unbiased estimator for genetic drift and effective population size.

Per Erik Jorde1, Nils Ryman.   

Abstract

Amounts of genetic drift and the effective size of populations can be estimated from observed temporal shifts in sample allele frequencies. Bias in this so-called temporal method has been noted in cases of small sample sizes and when allele frequencies are highly skewed. We characterize bias in commonly applied estimators under different sampling plans and propose an alternative estimator for genetic drift and effective size that weights alleles differently. Numerical evaluations of exact probability distributions and computer simulations verify that this new estimator yields unbiased estimates also when based on a modest number of alleles and loci. At the cost of a larger standard deviation, it thus eliminates the bias associated with earlier estimators. The new estimator should be particularly useful for microsatellite loci and panels of SNPs, representing a large number of alleles, many of which will occur at low frequencies.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17720927      PMCID: PMC2034655          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.075481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  20 in total

1.  Properties of bias and variance of two multiallelic estimators of F(ST).

Authors:  N Raufaste; F Bonhomme
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  Monte Carlo evaluation of the likelihood for N(e) from temporally spaced samples.

Authors:  E C Anderson; E G Williamson; E A Thompson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  A pseudo-likelihood method for estimating effective population size from temporally spaced samples.

Authors:  J Wang
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  Likelihood-based estimation of the effective population size using temporal changes in allele frequencies: a genealogical approach.

Authors:  Pierre Berthier; Mark A Beaumont; Jean-Marie Cornuet; Gordon Luikart
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Using maximum likelihood to estimate population size from temporal changes in allele frequencies.

Authors:  E G Williamson; M Slatkin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Estimating effective population size and migration rates from genetic samples over space and time.

Authors:  Jinliang Wang; Michael C Whitlock
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Comparative evaluation of a new effective population size estimator based on approximate bayesian computation.

Authors:  David A Tallmon; Gordon Luikart; Mark A Beaumont
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Temporal estimates of effective population size in species with overlapping generations.

Authors:  Robin S Waples; Masashi Yokota
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  A new method for estimating the effective population size from allele frequency changes.

Authors:  E Pollak
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  The genetic effective and adult census size of an Australian population of tiger prawns (Penaeus esculentus).

Authors:  Jennifer R Ovenden; David Peel; Raewyn Street; Anthony J Courtney; Simon D Hoyle; Samantha L Peel; Heather Podlich
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 6.185

View more
  76 in total

Review 1.  Fundamental concepts in genetics: effective population size and patterns of molecular evolution and variation.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Quasi equilibrium, variance effective size and fixation index for populations with substructure.

Authors:  Ola Hössjer; Nils Ryman
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  Stock enhancement or sea ranching? Insights from monitoring the genetic diversity, relatedness and effective population size in a seeded great scallop population (Pecten maximus).

Authors:  R Morvezen; P Boudry; J Laroche; G Charrier
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  A longitudinal genetic survey identifies temporal shifts in the population structure of Dutch house sparrows.

Authors:  L Cousseau; M Husemann; R Foppen; C Vangestel; L Lens
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Estimating contemporary effective population size on the basis of linkage disequilibrium in the face of migration.

Authors:  Robin S Waples; Phillip R England
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Inferring Demography and Selection in Organisms Characterized by Skewed Offspring Distributions.

Authors:  Andrew M Sackman; Rebecca B Harris; Jeffrey D Jensen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Peak and persistent excess of genetic diversity following an abrupt migration increase.

Authors:  Nicolas Alcala; Daniela Streit; Jérôme Goudet; Séverine Vuilleumier
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Small Bottleneck Size in a Highly Multipartite Virus during a Complete Infection Cycle.

Authors:  Romain Gallet; Frédéric Fabre; Gaël Thébaud; Mircea T Sofonea; Anne Sicard; Stéphane Blanc; Yannis Michalakis
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  The Number of Target Molecules of the Amplification Step Limits Accuracy and Sensitivity in Ultradeep-Sequencing Viral Population Studies.

Authors:  Romain Gallet; Frédéric Fabre; Yannis Michalakis; Stéphane Blanc
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  Population structure and effective/census population size ratio in threatened three-spined stickleback populations from an isolated river basin in northwest Spain.

Authors:  A Pérez-Figueroa; C Fernández; R Amaro; M Hermida; E San Miguel
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 1.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.