Literature DB >> 17720644

Comparison of outcomes and donor-site morbidity in unilateral free TRAM versus DIEP flap breast reconstruction.

M V Schaverien1, A G B Perks, S J McCulley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: At long-term follow up we cannot easily differentiate between patients who have undergone free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap and deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction in terms of subjective functional limitations of daily activities. The aim of this study was to evaluate postoperative outcomes and long-term subjective functional deficit in patients following unilateral free TRAM compared with DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
METHODS: Sixty consecutive patients who underwent unilateral autologous breast reconstruction were included in the study, 30 of whom had undergone a DIEP flap, and 30 a free TRAM flap. Surgical and postoperative outcome data were collected and a postal questionnaire was sent to each patient at least 6 months postoperatively consisting of a short functional assessment questionnaire and a Short Form 36 (SF-36) survey.
RESULTS: We found no significant difference in postoperative outcomes or in the subjective ability to perform activities of daily living, including work, domestic activities, sports and hobbies, between patients who underwent TRAM flap breast reconstruction and those who underwent a DIEP flap, and no significant difference between the groups for scores on the physical functioning, role-physical, or bodily pain scales of the SF-36.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that harvesting of the free TRAM flap results in no significant difference in postoperative outcomes or in the subjective ability to perform activities of daily living compared with the DIEP flap.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17720644     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  9 in total

1.  Scars and perforator-based flaps in the abdominal region: a contraindication?

Authors:  Adrian Dragu; Frank Unglaub; Maya B Wolf; Justus P Beier; Saskia M K Schnabl; Ulrich Kneser; Mareike Leffler; Raymund E Horch
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 2.  Abdominal perforator vs. muscle sparing flaps for breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Paris D Butler; Liza C Wu
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-06

Review 3.  Morbidity of the Donor Site and Complication Rates of Breast Reconstruction with Autologous Abdominal Flaps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hatan Mortada; Taif Fawaz AlNojaidi; Razan AlRabah; Yousif Almohammadi; Raghad AlKhashan; Hattan Aljaaly
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 2.269

4.  A Meta-analysis of Clinical, Patient-Reported Outcomes and Cost of DIEP versus Implant-based Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Ankur Khajuria; Max Prokopenko; Max Greenfield; Oliver Smith; Andrea L Pusic; Afshin Mosahebi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-10-28

5.  The Rectus Abdominis Perforator Turndown Flap for Preserving Rectus Continuity: A DIEP Alternative?

Authors:  Warren M Rozen; Robert Phan; Marc A Seifman; Lisa Ellis; David J Hunter-Smith
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-01-25

6.  Satisfaction following Unilateral Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison of Pedicled TRAM and Free Abdominal Flaps.

Authors:  Jonathan A Schwitzer; H Catherine Miller; Andrea L Pusic; Evan Matros; Babak J Mehrara; Colleen M McCarthy; Peter A Lennox; Nancy Van Laeken; Joseph J Disa
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-08-19

7.  Patient-Reported Assessment of Functional Gait Outcomes following Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator Reconstruction.

Authors:  Kevin Hur; Rika Ohkuma; Justin L Bellamy; Michiyo Yamazaki; Michele A Manahan; Ariel N Rad; Damon S Cooney; Gedge D Rosson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2013-09-10

8.  Complications and Patient-reported Outcomes after TRAM and DIEP Flaps: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Waverley Y He; Leen El Eter; Pooja Yesantharao; Bethany Hung; Haley Owens; Sarah Persing; Justin M Sacks
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-10-29

9.  Validating machine learning approaches for prediction of donor related complication in microsurgical breast reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yujin Myung; Sungmi Jeon; Chanyeong Heo; Eun-Kyu Kim; Eunyoung Kang; Hee-Chul Shin; Eun-Joo Yang; Jae Hoon Jeong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.