Literature DB >> 17720387

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in left ventricular assist device bridge-to-transplant patients.

Jacob N Schroder1, Mani A Daneshmand, Nestor R Villamizar, Rebecca P Petersen, Laura J Blue, Ian J Welsby, Andrew J Lodge, Thomas L Ortel, Joseph G Rogers, Carmelo A Milano.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The presence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) increases the risk for thromboembolic events in ventricular assist device (VAD) patients undergoing transplantation. However, cardiopulmonary bypass with alternative anticoagulants is often complicated by bleeding. Owing to this concern, we compared outcomes of HIT-positive versus control bridge-to-transplantation VAD patients; both groups were reexposed to heparin for cardiopulmonary bypass during transplant.
METHODS: From February 2000 to January 2006, data were reviewed on 92 consecutive adult patients who underwent VAD placement as a bridge to transplantation. Patients in whom thrombocytopenia developed after heparin exposure were tested for HIT with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for antiheparin/platelet factor-4 (HPF4) antibody (GTI Diagnostics, Waukesha, Wisconsin). During VAD support, heparin was avoided in HIT-positive patients, but all patients were reexposed to heparin during transplantation. Comparisons between HIT-positive and control patients for survival and freedom from thromboembolic events were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Continuous and categorical variables were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum and Student t test.
RESULTS: Twenty-four of the 92 patients (26.1%) were determined to be HIT positive by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Survival to transplant was not different between the two groups. When compared with control patients, HIT-positive patients who were reexposed to heparin had a greater decrease in platelet counts immediately after transplant (postoperative days 1 to 4, p < 0.05). Despite this transient thrombocytopenia, there was no difference in posttransplant mortality or thromboembolism.
CONCLUSIONS: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia-positive VAD patients did not experience increased thromboembolism or mortality after heparin reexposure. In light of the risks of using heparin alternatives, heparin reexposure is a safe management strategy for HIT-positive VAD patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17720387     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.03.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  4 in total

Review 1.  Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia for the Perioperative and Critical Care Clinician.

Authors:  Ingrid Moreno-Duarte; Kamrouz Ghadimi
Journal:  Curr Anesthesiol Rep       Date:  2020-08-29

2.  2019 EACTS Expert Consensus on long-term mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Evgenij V Potapov; Christiaan Antonides; Maria G Crespo-Leiro; Alain Combes; Gloria Färber; Margaret M Hannan; Marian Kukucka; Nicolaas de Jonge; Antonio Loforte; Lars H Lund; Paul Mohacsi; Michiel Morshuis; Ivan Netuka; Mustafa Özbaran; Federico Pappalardo; Anna Mara Scandroglio; Martin Schweiger; Steven Tsui; Daniel Zimpfer; Finn Gustafsson
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.191

3.  Coil Embolization for a Cerebral Aneurysm in a Heart Transplantation Patient: A Case Report.

Authors:  Masatoshi Takagaki; Tomoyoshi Nakagawa; Shuhei Kawabata; Nobuyuki Izutsu; Takeo Nishida; Hajime Nakamura; Haruhiko Kishima
Journal:  NMC Case Rep J       Date:  2019-12-18

Review 4.  Mechanical circulatory assist devices: a primer for critical care and emergency physicians.

Authors:  Ayan Sen; Joel S Larson; Kianoush B Kashani; Stacy L Libricz; Bhavesh M Patel; Pramod K Guru; Cory M Alwardt; Octavio Pajaro; J Christopher Farmer
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 9.097

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.