Literature DB >> 17720346

Effect of using endorectal coil in preoperative staging of rectal carcinomas by pelvic MR imaging.

Fuldem Yildirim Donmez1, Mehtap Tunaci, Ensar Yekeler, Emre Balik, Atadan Tunaci, Gulden Acunas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging with pelvic phased-array and endorectal coils prospectively, and evaluate if endorectal coil provides any additional information to high resolution pelvic MR imaging in rectal carcinoma staging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative MRI of 25 patients with rectal carcinoma was performed with pelvic phased-array coil alone, and with both phased-array coil and endorectal coil placed. Staging was made by evaluating images obtained by using both coils prospectively, and correlated with histopathologic staging. The images were then assessed separately, and compared to each other retrospectively.
RESULTS: Two and 3 of the 5 histopathologically proved T1 tumors were staged correctly on MRI with pelvic phased-array coil alone and after the endorectal coil placement, respectively. Histopathologically identified five T2 tumors were staged correctly as T2 in 4 of the cases, 1 was understaged and 10 of 14 patients who had T3 tumor were staged as T3, 4 of them were understaged as T2 on both techniques. Specificity, sensitivity and accuracy rates for staging of T3 tumors were found as 71%, 100% and 84%, respectively, for each technique. Sensitivity and positive predictive value of N staging were both 88% on both techniques.
CONCLUSION: Pelvic MR imaging after the placement of endorectal coil in addition to the phase-array coil was not superior to the imaging with phased-array coil alone in T staging of rectal carcinomas and the latter achieved better visualization of the lymph nodes by means of larger field of view.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17720346     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.06.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  2 in total

1.  Optimizing adjuvant treatment decisions for stage t2 rectal cancer based on mesorectal node size: a decision analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca I Hartman; Connie Y Chang; Jennifer Y Wo; Jonathan D Eisenberg; Theodore S Hong; Mukesh G Harisinghani; G Scott Gazelle; Pari V Pandharipande
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in rectal cancer: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Michael R Torkzad; Lars Påhlman; Bengt Glimelius
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2010-08-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.