Literature DB >> 17720232

A comparison of urinary complications following total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy to open abdominal surgery.

Stefano Uccella1, Rosa Laterza, Giuseppe Ciravolo, Eugenio Volpi, Massimo Franchi, Francesca Zefiro, Nicoletta Donadello, Fabio Ghezzi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (TLRH) and laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy (LPS) to total abdominal radical hysterectomy (TARH) and pelvic lymphadenectomy (LPT) in terms of urinary tract lesions and postoperative urinary retention.
METHODS: Starting in 2004, we treated all early stage cervical cancer patients with TLRH and LPS. The control group for this analysis was a historical cohort of patients treated with TARH+LPT. Within the TLRH+LPS group, we assessed whether the width of parametrial tissue removed was a risk factor for urinary tract injuries or postoperative urinary retention.
RESULTS: Fifty women were included in the TLRH+LPS group and forty-eight were included in the TARH+LPT group. There were no conversions from laparoscopy to laparotomy. There was no statistically significant difference in intraoperative urinary complications between the groups. Four (8%) intraoperative urinary tract injuries in the LPS (3 cystotomies and 1 ureteral lesions all repaired laparoscopically) and 2 (4.2%) in the LPT group (2 cystotomies) occurred (p=0.68). Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in postoperative urinary complications between groups. Urinary postoperative complications were: 1 (2%) ureterovaginal and 1 vesicovaginal fistulas, 1 delayed ureteric fistula in LPS group vs. 0 in LPT group (p=0.24). Urinary retention was complained by 7 (14%) and 7 (14.6%) patients in LPS and LPT groups respectively (p=1.00). The average width of parametrial tissue removed in the LPS group was 32.2+14.0 mm in patients with vs. 39.5+13.6 mm in patients without urinary complications (p=0.11).
CONCLUSIONS: A laparoscopic approach is comparable to the laparotomy in terms of urinary lesions and postoperative retention. The width of parametrium removed does not affect the risk of urinary lesions or postoperative retention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17720232     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.07.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  7 in total

1.  Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy has higher risk of perioperative urologic complication than abdominal radical hysterectomy: a meta-analysis of 38 studies.

Authors:  Jong Ha Hwang; Bo Wook Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Vaginal-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: rationale, technique, results.

Authors:  Elisabeth Gottschalk; Malgorzata Lanowska; Vito Chiantera; Simone Marnitz; Achim Schneider; Verena Brink-Spalink; Kati Hasenbein; Christhardt Koehler
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2011 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 3.  Assessment of morbidity in gynaecologic oncology laparoscopy and identification of possible risk factors.

Authors:  Maite Peña-Fernández; Inés Solar-Vilariño; María Xosé Rodríguez-Álvarez; Ignacio Zapardiel; Francisco Estévez; Pilar Gayoso-Diz
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2015-12-14

4.  Postoperative pain and perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Luciana Silveira Campos; Leo Francisco Limberger; Airton Tetelbom Stein; Antonio Nocchi Kalil
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Laparoscopic vs. Open Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Single-Institution, Propensity Score Matching Study in China.

Authors:  Zhen Yuan; Dongyan Cao; Jie Yang; Mei Yu; Keng Shen; Jiaxin Yang; Ying Zhang; Huimei Zhou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Total laparoscopic vs. conventional open abdominal nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: clinical, surgical, oncological and functional outcomes in 301 patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Marcello Ceccaroni; Giovanni Roviglione; Mario Malzoni; Francesco Cosentino; Emanuela Spagnolo; Roberto Clarizia; Paolo Casadio; Renato Seracchioli; Fabio Ghezzi; Daniele Mautone; Francesco Bruni; Stefano Uccella
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.401

7.  Prognostic and Safety Roles in Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tiefeng Cao; Yanling Feng; Qidan Huang; Ting Wan; Jihong Liu
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 1.878

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.