Perry S Binder1. 1. Private Clinical Practice, San Diego, California 92122, USA. garrett23@aol.com
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine a database of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) procedures for preoperative and operative factors assumed to increase the risk for developing post-LASIK ectasia. SETTING: Private clinical practice. METHODS: A computer database was queried for eyes that had LASIK for myopic refractive errors with the following characteristics: preoperative corneal thickness 500 microm or less, mean keratometry greater than 47.0 diopters (D), patient age 25 years or younger, attempted correction greater than -8.0 D, refractive astigmatism not with-the-rule and greater than 2.0 D, and residual stromal bed thickness (RST) 250 microm or less. Flap thickness and RST were measured using ultrasound pachymetry. All recorded information was exported to MS Excel and analyzed for eyes that had ectasia. RESULTS: Of the 9700 eyes in the database, none with the above characteristics developed ectasia over mean follow-up periods exceeding 2 years. Seven eyes had multiple risk factors without ectasia. Three eyes with abnormal preoperative topography developed ectasia. CONCLUSIONS: Individual preoperative and operative factors did not in and of themselves increase the risk for ectasia. Unmeasured and unknown factors that affect the individual cornea's biomechanical stability, in combination with some suspected risk factors as well as the current inability to identify corneas at risk for developing ectatic disorders, probably account for most eyes that develop ectasia today.
PURPOSE: To examine a database of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) procedures for preoperative and operative factors assumed to increase the risk for developing post-LASIK ectasia. SETTING: Private clinical practice. METHODS: A computer database was queried for eyes that had LASIK for myopic refractive errors with the following characteristics: preoperative corneal thickness 500 microm or less, mean keratometry greater than 47.0 diopters (D), patient age 25 years or younger, attempted correction greater than -8.0 D, refractive astigmatism not with-the-rule and greater than 2.0 D, and residual stromal bed thickness (RST) 250 microm or less. Flap thickness and RST were measured using ultrasound pachymetry. All recorded information was exported to MS Excel and analyzed for eyes that had ectasia. RESULTS: Of the 9700 eyes in the database, none with the above characteristics developed ectasia over mean follow-up periods exceeding 2 years. Seven eyes had multiple risk factors without ectasia. Three eyes with abnormal preoperative topography developed ectasia. CONCLUSIONS: Individual preoperative and operative factors did not in and of themselves increase the risk for ectasia. Unmeasured and unknown factors that affect the individual cornea's biomechanical stability, in combination with some suspected risk factors as well as the current inability to identify corneas at risk for developing ectatic disorders, probably account for most eyes that develop ectasia today.