Literature DB >> 17719507

START triage: does it work?

Mark E Gebhart1, Robert Pence.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A mass casualty incident (MCI) demands rapid and efficient triage of victims. The Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment (START) protocol has been proposed to identify salvageable victims from those with imminent mortality. This study evaluates the efficacy of START triage to predict likelihood of mortality of an MCI trauma victim.
METHODS: Trauma patients were randomly selected using the trauma database at a local Level II trauma center. Survival was defined as a discharge from the hospital with the primary endpoint being death. For respiratory rate <30, pulse <100, and Glasgow Coma Scale score >14, one point was given to the victim for each category. Persons who did not meet these criteria were given a score of zero. The scores were then tabulated and analyzed with respect to the primary endpoint.
RESULTS: Of the 355 persons analyzed, 341 (96%) survived and 14 (3.9%) were categorized as deceased. For patients with a tabulated score </=1, the positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 0.4 and 0.98, respectively. For patients with a tabulated score of >/=2, the PPV and NPV were 0.08 and 0.99, respectively. DISCUSSION: Of the total victims, 75.77% with a respiratory rate <30, palpable radial pulse, and intact mental status survived. The deceased victims with tabulated scores of 1, 2, and 3 had mortalities of 50%, 28%, and 21%, respectively. The trend toward lower tabulated scores in the deceased victims suggests efficacy with START triage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17719507     DOI: 10.1016/j.dmr.2007.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disaster Manag Response        ISSN: 1540-2495


  7 in total

Review 1.  A review of the literature on the validity of mass casualty triage systems with a focus on chemical exposures.

Authors:  Joan M Culley; Erik Svendsen
Journal:  Am J Disaster Med       Date:  2014

Review 2.  [Triage protocols for mass casualty incidents : An overview 30 years after START].

Authors:  S Streckbein; T Kohlmann; J Luxen; T Birkholz; S Prückner
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Usability and Reliability of Smart Glasses for Secondary Triage During Mass Casualty Incidents.

Authors:  John Broach; Alexander Hart; Matthew Griswold; Jeffrey Lai; Edward W Boyer; Aaron B Skolnik; Peter R Chai
Journal:  Proc Annu Hawaii Int Conf Syst Sci       Date:  2018-01-03

4.  Survival prediction of trauma patients: a study on US National Trauma Data Bank.

Authors:  I Sefrioui; R Amadini; J Mauro; A El Fallahi; M Gabbrielli
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 3.693

5.  S.T.A.R.T.T. plus: addition of prehospital personnel to a national multidisciplinary crisis resource management trauma team training course.

Authors:  Lawrence M Gillman; Doug Martin; Paul T Engels; Peter Brindley; Sandy Widder; Cheryl French
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Promptly reporting of critical laboratory values in pediatrics: A work in progress.

Authors:  Consolato Sergi
Journal:  World J Clin Pediatr       Date:  2018-11-12

Review 7.  The development and features of the Spanish prehospital advanced triage method (META) for mass casualty incidents.

Authors:  Pedro Arcos González; Rafael Castro Delgado; Tatiana Cuartas Alvarez; Gracia Garijo Gonzalo; Carlos Martinez Monzon; Nieves Pelaez Corres; Alberto Rodriguez Soler; Fernando Turegano Fuentes
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.953

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.