Literature DB >> 17719157

A review of the evidence linking adult attachment theory and chronic pain: presenting a conceptual model.

Pamela Meredith1, Tamara Ownsworth, Jenny Strong.   

Abstract

It is now well established that pain is a multidimensional phenomenon, affected by a gamut of psychosocial and biological variables. According to diathesis-stress models of chronic pain, some individuals are more vulnerable to developing disability following acute pain because they possess particular psychosocial vulnerabilities which interact with physical pathology to impact negatively upon outcome. Attachment theory, a theory of social and personality development, has been proposed as a comprehensive developmental model of pain, implicating individual adult attachment pattern in the ontogenesis and maintenance of chronic pain. The present paper reviews and critically appraises studies which link adult attachment theory with chronic pain. Together, these papers offer support for the role of insecure attachment as a diathesis (or vulnerability) for problematic adjustment to pain. The Attachment-Diathesis Model of Chronic Pain developed from this body of literature, combines adult attachment theory with the diathesis-stress approach to chronic pain. The evidence presented in this review, and the associated model, advances our understanding of the developmental origins of chronic pain conditions, with potential application in guiding early pain intervention and prevention efforts, as well as tailoring interventions to suit specific patient needs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17719157     DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2007.07.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0272-7358


  48 in total

1.  Attachment and adjustment in adolescents and young adults with a history of pediatric functional abdominal pain.

Authors:  Kelsey T Laird; Kristopher J Preacher; Lynn S Walker
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.442

2.  Chronic pain and the interpersonal theory of suicide.

Authors:  Keith G Wilson; John Kowal; Peter R Henderson; Lachlan A McWilliams; Katherine Péloquin
Journal:  Rehabil Psychol       Date:  2013-02

Review 3.  A review of the evidence regarding associations between attachment theory and experimentally induced pain.

Authors:  Pamela Joy Meredith
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2013-04

Review 4.  [Stress-induced hyperalgesia (SIH) as a consequence of emotional deprivation and psychosocial traumatization in childhood : Implications for the treatment of chronic pain].

Authors:  U T Egle; N Egloff; R von Känel
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 5.  Pain and emotion: a biopsychosocial review of recent research.

Authors:  Mark A Lumley; Jay L Cohen; George S Borszcz; Annmarie Cano; Alison M Radcliffe; Laura S Porter; Howard Schubiner; Francis J Keefe
Journal:  J Clin Psychol       Date:  2011-06-06

6.  A Social Psychological Perspective on the Links between Close Relationships and Health.

Authors:  Richard B Slatcher; Emre Selcuk
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-02-08

7.  Attachment style is associated with perceived spouse responses and pain-related outcomes.

Authors:  Laura P Forsythe; Joan M Romano; Mark P Jensen; Beverly E Thorn
Journal:  Rehabil Psychol       Date:  2012-11-12

8.  Children with disrupted attachment histories: interventions and psychophysiological indices of effects.

Authors:  Carlo Schuengel; Mirjam Oosterman; Paula S Sterkenburg
Journal:  Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.033

9.  Attachment and Psychological Health in Older Couples Coping with Pain.

Authors:  Joan K Monin; Lu Zhou; Trace Kershaw
Journal:  GeroPsych (Bern)       Date:  2014-09

10.  [Attachment style and cytokine levels in patients with fibromyalgia. A prospective longitudinal study].

Authors:  H Wang; A Weber; M Schiltenwolf; D Amelung
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.107

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.