AIMS: A nonthermal atmospheric plasma, designed for biomedical applications, was tested for its antimicrobial activity against biofilm cultures of a key cariogenic bacterium Streptococcus mutans. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Strep. mutans biofilms were grown with and without 0.15% sucrose. A chlorhexidine digluconate rinse (0.2%) was used as a positive antimicrobial reference. The presence of sucrose and the frequency of plasma application during growth were shown to have a significant effect on the response to treatment and antibacterial activity. CONCLUSIONS: A single plasma treatment for 1 min on biofilms cultured without sucrose caused no re-growth within the observation period. However, with either single or repeated plasma treatments of 1 min, on biofilms cultured with 0.15% sucrose, growth was only reduced. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: In summary, there may be a role for nonthermal plasma therapies in dental procedures. Sucrose and associated growth conditions may be a factor in the survival of oral biofilms after treatment.
AIMS: A nonthermal atmospheric plasma, designed for biomedical applications, was tested for its antimicrobial activity against biofilm cultures of a key cariogenic bacterium Streptococcus mutans. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Strep. mutans biofilms were grown with and without 0.15% sucrose. A chlorhexidine digluconate rinse (0.2%) was used as a positive antimicrobial reference. The presence of sucrose and the frequency of plasma application during growth were shown to have a significant effect on the response to treatment and antibacterial activity. CONCLUSIONS: A single plasma treatment for 1 min on biofilms cultured without sucrose caused no re-growth within the observation period. However, with either single or repeated plasma treatments of 1 min, on biofilms cultured with 0.15% sucrose, growth was only reduced. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: In summary, there may be a role for nonthermal plasma therapies in dental procedures. Sucrose and associated growth conditions may be a factor in the survival of oral biofilms after treatment.
Authors: Stefan Rupf; Ahmad Nour Idlibi; Fuad Al Marrawi; Matthias Hannig; Andreas Schubert; Lutz von Mueller; Wolfgang Spitzer; Henrik Holtmann; Antje Lehmann; Andre Rueppell; Axel Schindler Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-10-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mahmoud Y Alkawareek; Qais Th Algwari; Garry Laverty; Sean P Gorman; William G Graham; Deborah O'Connell; Brendan F Gilmore Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-08-31 Impact factor: 3.240