OBJECTIVES: Parental exposure to pesticides and the risk of leukemia in offspring were examined in a population-based case-control study in Costa Rica. METHODS: All cases of childhood leukemia (N=334), in 1995-2000, were identified at the Cancer Registry and the Children's Hospital. Population controls (N=579) were drawn from the National Birth Registry. Interviews of parents were conducted using conventional and icon-based calendar forms. An exposure model was constructed for 25 pesticides in five time periods. RESULTS: Mothers' exposures to any pesticides during the year before conception and during the first and second trimesters were associated with the risk [odds ratio (OR) 2.4, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.0-5.9; OR 22, 95% CI 2.8-171.5; OR 4.5, 95% CI 1.4-14.7, respectively] and during anytime (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.0-4.8). An association was found for fathers' exposures to any pesticides during the second trimester (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.0-2.3). An increased risk with respect to organophosphates was found for mothers during the first trimester (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.0-12.2) and for fathers during the year before conception and the first trimester (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.0-2.2 and OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.0-2.6, respectively), and benzimidazoles during the first, second, and third trimesters of pregnancy (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.0-4.4; OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.0-5.0; OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.0-5.2, respectively). There was a suggestion of an exposure-response gradient for fathers as regards picloram, benomyl, and paraquat. Age at diagnosis was positively associated with fathers' exposures and inversely associated with mothers' exposures. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that parental exposure to certain pesticides may increase the risk of leukemia in offspring.
OBJECTIVES: Parental exposure to pesticides and the risk of leukemia in offspring were examined in a population-based case-control study in Costa Rica. METHODS: All cases of childhood leukemia (N=334), in 1995-2000, were identified at the Cancer Registry and the Children's Hospital. Population controls (N=579) were drawn from the National Birth Registry. Interviews of parents were conducted using conventional and icon-based calendar forms. An exposure model was constructed for 25 pesticides in five time periods. RESULTS: Mothers' exposures to any pesticides during the year before conception and during the first and second trimesters were associated with the risk [odds ratio (OR) 2.4, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.0-5.9; OR 22, 95% CI 2.8-171.5; OR 4.5, 95% CI 1.4-14.7, respectively] and during anytime (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.0-4.8). An association was found for fathers' exposures to any pesticides during the second trimester (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.0-2.3). An increased risk with respect to organophosphates was found for mothers during the first trimester (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.0-12.2) and for fathers during the year before conception and the first trimester (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.0-2.2 and OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.0-2.6, respectively), and benzimidazoles during the first, second, and third trimesters of pregnancy (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.0-4.4; OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.0-5.0; OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.0-5.2, respectively). There was a suggestion of an exposure-response gradient for fathers as regards picloram, benomyl, and paraquat. Age at diagnosis was positively associated with fathers' exposures and inversely associated with mothers' exposures. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that parental exposure to certain pesticides may increase the risk of leukemia in offspring.
Authors: Robert B Gunier; Alice Kang; S Katharine Hammond; Kyndaron Reinier; C Suzanne Lea; Jeffrey S Chang; Monique Does; Ghislaine Scelo; Janice Kirsch; Vonda Crouse; Robert Cooper; Patricia Quinlan; Catherine Metayer Journal: Environ Res Date: 2017-03-19 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Liliana A Zúñiga-Venegas; Carly Hyland; María Teresa Muñoz-Quezada; Lesliam Quirós-Alcalá; Mariana Butinof; Rafael Buralli; Andres Cardenas; Ricardo A Fernandez; Claudia Foerster; Nelson Gouveia; Juan P Gutiérrez Jara; Boris A Lucero; María Pía Muñoz; Muriel Ramírez-Santana; Anna R Smith; Noemi Tirado; Berna van Wendel de Joode; Gloria M Calaf; Alexis J Handal; Agnes Soares da Silva; Sandra Cortés; Ana M Mora Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2022-09-29 Impact factor: 11.035
Authors: Mary H Ward; Joanne S Colt; Catherine Metayer; Robert B Gunier; Jay Lubin; Vonda Crouse; Marcia G Nishioka; Peggy Reynolds; Patricia A Buffler Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2009-01-27 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Catherine Metayer; Ghislaine Scelo; Alice Y Kang; Robert B Gunier; Kyndaron Reinier; Suzanne Lea; Jeffrey S Chang; Steve Selvin; Janice Kirsch; Vonda Crouse; Monique Does; Patricia Quinlan; S Katharine Hammond Journal: Environ Res Date: 2016-08-03 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Rudolph P Rull; Robert Gunier; Julie Von Behren; Andrew Hertz; Vonda Crouse; Patricia A Buffler; Peggy Reynolds Journal: Environ Res Date: 2009-08-22 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Erin L Marcotte; Thomas P Thomopoulos; Claire Infante-Rivard; Jacqueline Clavel; Eleni Th Petridou; Joachim Schüz; Sameera Ezzat; John D Dockerty; Catherine Metayer; Corrado Magnani; Michael E Scheurer; Beth A Mueller; Ana M Mora; Catharina Wesseling; Alkistis Skalkidou; Wafaa M Rashed; Stephen S Francis; Roula Ajrouche; Friederike Erdmann; Laurent Orsi; Logan G Spector Journal: Lancet Haematol Date: 2016-02-27 Impact factor: 18.959
Authors: Amalia Laborde; Fernando Tomasina; Fabrizio Bianchi; Marie-Noel Bruné; Irena Buka; Pietro Comba; Lilian Corra; Liliana Cori; Christin Maria Duffert; Raul Harari; Ivano Iavarone; Melissa A McDiarmid; Kimberly A Gray; Peter D Sly; Agnes Soares; William A Suk; Philip J Landrigan Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2014-12-05 Impact factor: 9.031