Hillary R Bogner1, Knashawn H Morales, Edward P Post, Martha L Bruce. 1. Department of Family Practice and Community Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St., 2 Gates Building, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. hillary.bogner@uphs.upenn.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We sought to test our a priori hypothesis that depressed patients with diabetes in practices implementing a depression management program would have a decreased risk of mortality compared with depressed patients with diabetes in usual-care practices. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We used data from the multisite, practice-randomized, controlled Prevention of Suicide in Primary Care Elderly: Collaborative Trial (PROSPECT), with patient recruitment from May 1999 to August 2001, supplemented with a search of the National Death Index. Twenty primary care practices participated from the greater metropolitan areas of New York City, New York; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. In all, 584 participants identified though a two-stage, age-stratified (aged 60-74 or >or=75 years) depression screening of randomly sampled patients and classified as depressed with complete information on diabetes status are included in these analyses. Of the 584 participants, 123 (21.2%) reported a history of diabetes. A depression care manager worked with primary care physicians to provide algorithm-based care. Vital status was assessed at 5 years. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 52.0 months, 110 depressed patients had died. Depressed patients with diabetes in the intervention category were less likely to have died during the 5-year follow-up interval than depressed diabetic patients in usual care after accounting for baseline differences among patients (adjusted hazard ratio 0.49 [95% CI 0.24-0.98]). CONCLUSIONS:Older depressed primary care patients with diabetes in practices implementing depression care management were less likely to die over the course of a 5-year interval than depressed patients with diabetes in usual-care practices.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: We sought to test our a priori hypothesis that depressedpatients with diabetes in practices implementing a depression management program would have a decreased risk of mortality compared with depressedpatients with diabetes in usual-care practices. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We used data from the multisite, practice-randomized, controlled Prevention of Suicide in Primary Care Elderly: Collaborative Trial (PROSPECT), with patient recruitment from May 1999 to August 2001, supplemented with a search of the National Death Index. Twenty primary care practices participated from the greater metropolitan areas of New York City, New York; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. In all, 584 participants identified though a two-stage, age-stratified (aged 60-74 or >or=75 years) depression screening of randomly sampled patients and classified as depressed with complete information on diabetes status are included in these analyses. Of the 584 participants, 123 (21.2%) reported a history of diabetes. A depression care manager worked with primary care physicians to provide algorithm-based care. Vital status was assessed at 5 years. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 52.0 months, 110 depressedpatients had died. Depressedpatients with diabetes in the intervention category were less likely to have died during the 5-year follow-up interval than depressed diabeticpatients in usual care after accounting for baseline differences among patients (adjusted hazard ratio 0.49 [95% CI 0.24-0.98]). CONCLUSIONS: Older depressed primary care patients with diabetes in practices implementing depression care management were less likely to die over the course of a 5-year interval than depressedpatients with diabetes in usual-care practices.
Authors: Mei Lu; Patrick D Lyden; Thomas G Brott; Scott Hamilton; Joseph P Broderick; James C Grotta Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2004-12-08 Impact factor: 2.390
Authors: Wayne J Katon; Carolyn Rutter; Greg Simon; Elizabeth H B Lin; Evette Ludman; Paul Ciechanowski; Leslie Kinder; Bessie Young; Michael Von Korff Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Xuanping Zhang; Susan L Norris; Edward W Gregg; Yiling J Cheng; Gloria Beckles; Henry S Kahn Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2005-04-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Joseph J Gallo; Hillary R Bogner; Knashawn H Morales; Edward P Post; Thomas Ten Have; Martha L Bruce Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Herbert C Schulberg; Edward P Post; Patrick J Raue; Thomas Ten Have; Mark Miller; Martha L Bruce Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Joseph J Gallo; Hillary R Bogner; Knashawn H Morales; Edward P Post; Julia Y Lin; Martha L Bruce Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2007-05-15 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Melissa L Walls; Benjamin D Aronson; Garrett V Soper; Michelle D Johnson-Jennings Journal: Diabetes Educ Date: 2014-02-21 Impact factor: 2.140
Authors: Carmen García-Peña; Fernando A Wagner; Sergio Sánchez-Garcia; Teresa Juárez-Cedillo; Claudia Espinel-Bermúdez; José Juan García-Gonzalez; Katia Gallegos-Carrillo; Francisco Franco-Marina; Joseph J Gallo Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-09-26 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Frank Petrak; Martin Hautzinger; Kristin Plack; Kai Kronfeld; Christian Ruckes; Stephan Herpertz; Matthias J Müller Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2010-05-04 Impact factor: 3.921