Literature DB >> 17717249

Ultrasound-guided interscalene needle placement produces successful anesthesia regardless of motor stimulation above or below 0.5 mA.

Sanjay K Sinha1, Jonathan H Abrams, Robert S Weller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We quantified the motor response after ultrasound (U-S)-guided needle placement for interscalene block (ISB). We then compared block characteristics based on motor response above or below 0.5 mA.
METHODS: Sixty-one patients scheduled for ambulatory shoulder surgery under ISB and general anesthesia were included in this prospective, observational study. Preoperatively, an insulated needle was positioned by U-S in the interscalene groove. The lowest current producing motor response was determined, and 30 mL 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine was injected. Motor and sensory block were tested in the upper trunk distribution for 15 min until general anesthesia was induced. Postoperatively, the success of upper trunk block, pain score in the postanesthesia care unit and block duration, and analgesic tablet consumption overnight were recorded. Patients were divided a priori into Group A (current < or =0.5 mA) and Group B (current >0.5 mA), and results were compared between groups.
RESULTS: The observed current range was 0.14-1.7 mA, with current < or =0.5 mA in 42% of patients (Group A). All patients had complete sensorimotor upper trunk block and none required narcotics in the postanesthesia care unit. Block duration (both groups: 17.8 +/- 4.9 h, mean +/- sd) and home analgesic use were equivalent. Sensory block onset was equivalent between groups, but incomplete motor block at 15 min was more likely in Group B: 37% vs 12% in Group A (P = 0.03).
CONCLUSION: During U-S-guided ISB using nerve stimulation, the observed motor response below or above 0.5 mA had no impact on success or duration of upper trunk block.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17717249     DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000271912.84440.01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  6 in total

Review 1.  Upper extremity regional anesthesia: essentials of our current understanding, 2008.

Authors:  Joseph M Neal; J C Gerancher; James R Hebl; Brian M Ilfeld; Colin J L McCartney; Carlo D Franco; Quinn H Hogan
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.288

2.  Upper extremity surgery in younger children under ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block: a case series.

Authors:  Hamid Reza Amiri; Ramin Espandar
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 1.548

3.  Upper extremity surgery in younger children under ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block: a case series.

Authors:  Hamid Reza Amiri; Ramin Espandar
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 1.548

4.  The role of electrical stimulation in ultrasound-guided subgluteal sciatic nerve block: a retrospective study on how response pattern and minimal evoked current affect the resultant blockade.

Authors:  Kaoru Hara; Shinichi Sakura; Naomi Yokokawa
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Ultrasound guidance in regional anesthesia: state of the art review through challenging clinical scenarios.

Authors:  Brian D Sites; John G Antonakakis
Journal:  Local Reg Anesth       Date:  2009-01-05

6.  No correlation between minimal electrical charge at the tip of the stimulating catheter and the efficacy of the peripheral nerve block catheter for brachial plexus block: a prospective blinded cohort study.

Authors:  Karin Pw Schoenmakers; Petra Jc Heesterbeek; Nigel Tm Jack; Rudolf Stienstra
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 2.217

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.