Literature DB >> 17716800

Up to 17-year controlled clinical study on post-and-cores and covering crowns.

Wietske A Fokkinga1, Cees M Kreulen, Ewald M Bronkhorst, Nico H J Creugers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this long-term follow-up was to collect up to 17-year survival data of different metal post-and-core restorations with a covering crown.
METHODS: At initiation of the study, a controlled clinical trial, single tooth was provided with an artificial covering crown, by 18 operators. Restorations under investigation were the post-and-core restorations: cast post-and-core restorations, prefabricated metal post and resin composite core restorations, and post-free all-composite core restorations. Before treatment allocation, the recipient tooth was categorized according to the expected dentin height after tooth preparation. A tooth was assessed to have "substantial dentin height" (Trial 1) or "minimal dentin height" (Trial 2). The study sample consisted of 257 patients that received 307 core restorations. The performance of the restorations was based on data collected from the files of the current dentists monitoring the oral health of the patients. The survival probability was analyzed at different levels: on the restoration level (S(R)), and on the level of the tooth carrying the restoration (S(T)). Kaplan Meier analyses were used to compare survival probabilities.
RESULTS: "Type of post-and-core restoration" showed no influence on the survival probability (at both levels) in both trials (P-value>0.05). The 17-year survival rates at restoration level varied from 71% to 80%, and at tooth level from 83% to 92%.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study showed no difference in survival probabilities among different core restorations under a covering crown of endodontically treated teeth. The preservation of substantial remaining coronal tooth structure seems to be critical to the long-term survival of endodontically treated crowned teeth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17716800     DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  13 in total

1.  A survey to compare the use and rationale for selection of intra-radicular posts among dental practitioners.

Authors:  I D Weerapperuma; C Taylor; J D Satterthwaite
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 2.  Direct or indirect post crowns to restore compromised teeth: a review of the literature.

Authors:  T A Owen; M Barber
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  A retrospective evaluation of teeth restored with zirconia ceramic posts: 10-year results.

Authors:  Maria Bateli; Matthias Kern; Martin Wolkewitz; Jörg R Strub; Wael Att
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Immediate and long-term microshear bond strength of resin-based cements to core build-up materials.

Authors:  Fernanda C Lacerda; Waldemir F Vieira-Junior; Paulo E de Lacerda; Cecília P Turssi; Roberta T Basting; Flávia L do Amaral; Fabiana Mg França
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-10-01

5.  Restoration of endodontically treated teeth review and treatment recommendations.

Authors:  Iris Slutzky-Goldberg; Hagay Slutzky; Colin Gorfil; Ami Smidt
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2010-01-26

Review 6.  An overview of clinical studies on fiber post systems.

Authors:  Idil Dikbas; Jale Tanalp
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-10-23

7.  Effect of tapering internal coronal walls on fracture resistance of anterior teeth treated with cast post and core: In vitro study.

Authors:  Loubna Shamseddine; Rita Eid; Fodda Homsy; Hasan Elhusseini
Journal:  J Dent Biomech       Date:  2014-08-12

8.  A retrospective multicenter study comparing metal-ceramic and composite single crowns performed in public general dentistry: 5-year results.

Authors:  Jennie Overmeer; Birger Narby; Lars Hjalmarsson; Kristina Arnrup; Alf Eliasson
Journal:  Acta Biomater Odontol Scand       Date:  2016-02-01

Review 9.  Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root-filled teeth.

Authors:  Patrick Sequeira-Byron; Zbys Fedorowicz; Ben Carter; Mona Nasser; Eman F Alrowaili
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-25

10.  Effect of Load Cycling on the Fracture Strength/Mode of Teeth Restored with FRC Posts or a FRC Liner and a Resin Composite.

Authors:  Maria D Gaintantzopoulou; Eleftherios T Farmakis; George C Eliades
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.