Literature DB >> 17716484

Antagonistic effects of soybean viruses on soybean aphid performance.

Jack R Donaldson1, Claudio Gratton.   

Abstract

Although there is long-standing recognition that pest complexes require different management approaches than individual pests, relatively little research has explored how pests interact. In particular, little is known of how herbivorous insects and plant pathogens interact when sharing the same host plant. The soybean aphid, Aphis glycines Mastumura, a recently introduced pest of soybean in the upper midwestern United States, and a complex of plant viruses vectored to soybean by insects have become a major concern for growers in the region. Given the abundance of soybean aphid and the increase in virus incidence in recent years, soybean aphids often use soybean infected by plant viral pathogens. We tested the hypothesis that soybean aphid performance is affected by virus infection of soybean plants. We conducted a series of field and laboratory experiments that examined how infection of soybeans with the common plant viruses, alfalfa mosaic, soybean mosaic, and bean pod mottle viruses, influenced soybean aphid performance. Soybean plants (in the field and laboratory) were hand inoculated with individual viruses, and aphids were allowed to colonize plants naturally in field experiments or added to the plants in clip-cages or within mesh bags in laboratory assays. In the field, aphid density on uninfected control soybean plants was nearly double that on infected plants. In laboratory assays, aphid population growth rates were on average 20% lower for aphids on virus infected compared with uninfected plants. Life table analyses showed that increased mortality on virus-infected plants likely explain differences in aphid population growth. Although there was some heterogeneity in the significance of treatment effects among different experiments, when independent experiments are taken together, there is on average an overall negative effect of these viruses on soybean aphids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17716484     DOI: 10.1603/0046-225x(2007)36[918:aeosvo]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Entomol        ISSN: 0046-225X            Impact factor:   2.377


  15 in total

1.  Host Plants Indirectly Influence Plant Virus Transmission by Altering Gut Cysteine Protease Activity of Aphid Vectors.

Authors:  Patricia V Pinheiro; Murad Ghanim; Mariko Alexander; Ana Rita Rebelo; Rogerio S Santos; Benjamin C Orsburn; Stewart Gray; Michelle Cilia
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Effects of Cucumber mosaic virus infection on vector and non-vector herbivores of squash.

Authors:  Kerry E Mauck; Consuelo M De Moraes; Mark C Mescher
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2010-11-01

3.  Deceptive chemical signals induced by a plant virus attract insect vectors to inferior hosts.

Authors:  Kerry E Mauck; Consuelo M De Moraes; Mark C Mescher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A negative effect of a pathogen on its vector? A plant pathogen increases the vulnerability of its vector to attack by natural enemies.

Authors:  Camila F de Oliveira; Elizabeth Y Long; Deborah L Finke
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Influence of a propagative plant virus on the fitness and wing dimorphism of infected and exposed insect vectors.

Authors:  Clesson H V Higashi; Alberto Bressan
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Vector-borne plant pathogens modify top-down and bottom-up effects on insect herbivores.

Authors:  Robert E Clark; David W Crowder
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Conditional facilitation of an aphid vector, Acyrthosiphon pisum, by the plant pathogen, pea enation mosaic virus.

Authors:  Simon Hodge; Glen Powell
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.857

8.  Modification of non-vector aphid feeding behavior on virus-infected host plant.

Authors:  Zuqing Hu; Huiyan Zhao; Thomas Thieme
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.857

9.  Reduction in fecundity and shifts in cellular processes by a native virus on an invasive insect.

Authors:  Bryan J Cassone; Andrew P Michel; Lucy R Stewart; Raman Bansal; M A Rouf Mian; Margaret G Redinbaugh
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  A plant virus manipulates the behavior of its whitefly vector to enhance its transmission efficiency and spread.

Authors:  Ana Moreno-Delafuente; Elisa Garzo; Aranzazu Moreno; Alberto Fereres
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.