Literature DB >> 17714842

Flux and concentration footprint modelling: state of the art.

T Vesala1, N Kljun, U Rannik, J Rinne, A Sogachev, T Markkanen, K Sabelfeld, Th Foken, M Y Leclerc.   

Abstract

Since early 1990s, the development of footprint models has been rapid with presently four different approaches being available: (i) analytical models, (ii) Lagrangian stochastic particle dispersion models, (iii) large-eddy simulations, and (iv) closure models. Parameterizations of some of these approaches have been developed, simplifying the original algorithms for use in practical applications. The paper provides a review of the footprint modelling. It also discusses our present understanding of the theoretical background, the most successful modelling approaches, as well as the usage and benefits of the footprint concept as it relates to flux measurements. There has recently been a trend emerging in modelling the behavior of the footprint functions using a less idealized, more realistic description of inhomogeneities, vegetation structure and topography, ultimately for reactive compounds. The estimation of footprints for application in the real world, complete with a multitude of interesting gaseous and particulate substances, remains a complex problem.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17714842     DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  6 in total

1.  Carbon dioxide fluxes from Tifway bermudagrass: early results.

Authors:  David L Cotten; G Zhang; M Y Leclerc; P Raymer; C J Steketee
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  An optical sensor network for vegetation phenology monitoring and satellite data calibration.

Authors:  Lars Eklundh; Hongxiao Jin; Per Schubert; Radoslaw Guzinski; Michal Heliasz
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 3.  Ground-based optical measurements at European flux sites: a review of methods, instruments and current controversies.

Authors:  Manuela Balzarolo; Karen Anderson; Caroline Nichol; Micol Rossini; Loris Vescovo; Nicola Arriga; Georg Wohlfahrt; Jean-Christophe Calvet; Arnaud Carrara; Sofia Cerasoli; Sergio Cogliati; Fabrice Daumard; Lars Eklundh; Jan A Elbers; Fatih Evrendilek; Rebecca N Handcock; Joerg Kaduk; Katja Klumpp; Bernard Longdoz; Giorgio Matteucci; Michele Meroni; Lenoardo Montagnani; Jean-Marc Ourcival; Enrique P Sánchez-Cañete; Jean-Yves Pontailler; Radoslaw Juszczak; Bob Scholes; M Pilar Martín
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Modeling the Footprint and Equivalent Radiance Transfer Path Length for Tower-Based Hemispherical Observations of Chlorophyll Fluorescence.

Authors:  Xinjie Liu; Liangyun Liu; Jiaochan Hu; Shanshan Du
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Predicting the severity of the grass pollen season and the effect of climate change in Northwest Europe.

Authors:  Alexander Kurganskiy; Simon Creer; Natasha de Vere; Gareth W Griffith; Nicholas J Osborne; Benedict W Wheeler; Rachel N McInnes; Yolanda Clewlow; Adam Barber; Georgina L Brennan; Helen M Hanlon; Matthew Hegarty; Caitlin Potter; Francis Rowney; Beverley Adams-Groom; Geoff M Petch; Catherine H Pashley; Jack Satchwell; Letty A de Weger; Karen Rasmussen; Gilles Oliver; Charlotte Sindt; Nicolas Bruffaerts; Carsten A Skjøth
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 14.136

6.  Detecting Hot Spots of Methane Flux Using Footprint-Weighted Flux Maps.

Authors:  Camilo Rey-Sanchez; Ariane Arias-Ortiz; Kuno Kasak; Housen Chu; Daphne Szutu; Joseph Verfaillie; Dennis Baldocchi
Journal:  J Geophys Res Biogeosci       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 4.432

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.