Literature DB >> 17714581

Low density lipoprotein from patients with Type 2 diabetes increases expression of monocyte matrix metalloproteinase and ADAM metalloproteinase genes.

Joanna R Worley1, David A Hughes, Nicoletta Dozio, Jelena Gavrilovic, Mike J Sampson.   

Abstract

AIMS: Type 2 diabetes is characterised by increased plasma concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines [such as tumour necrosis factor - alpha; TNF-alpha] and soluble forms of adhesion molecules involved in leukocyte - endothelial interactions. These molecules are synthesised as transmembrane proteins and the plasma soluble forms are generated by ectodomain cleavage from the cell surface by members of the ADAM [adisintegrin and metalloproteinase] proteinase family. We hypothesised that plasma low density lipoprotein [LDL] from subjects with Type 2 diabetes would influence in vitro monocytic ADAM and matrix metalloproteinase [MMP] gene expression differently compared to control LDL.
METHODS: We examined relative mRNA expression by real time PCR in a monocytic cell line [THP-1] cultured for 4, 8 and 24 hrs with human plasma LDL derived from subjects with [n = 5] or without [n = 4] Type 2 diabetes. Gene expression for MMP-1 and 9, and ADAM - 8, 15, 17 and 28 was studied.
RESULTS: Type 2 diabetes LDL significantly increased gene expression of MMP - 1 [p < 0.01] MMP - 9 [p < 0.001], and ADAM 17 [p < 0.05], - 28 [p < 0.01] and - 15 [p < 0.01] compared to control LDL. Type 2 diabetes LDL had disparate effects on inhibitors of MMP.
CONCLUSION: These data suggest that Type 2 diabetes LDL could lead to increased adhesion molecule and TNF alpha cell surface shedding, and vascular plaque instability, by promoting increased expression of ADAM and MMP genes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17714581      PMCID: PMC2041943          DOI: 10.1186/1475-2840-6-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol        ISSN: 1475-2840            Impact factor:   9.951


Background

Type 2 diabetes is characterised by elevated circulating levels of pro – inflammatory cytokines such as Tumour Necrosis Factor alpha [TNF-α] and the soluble forms of adhesion molecules involved in leukocyte – endothelial cell interactions, such as intercellular adhesion molecule-1 [ICAM-1], vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 [VCAM-1] and E-selectin. [1]. These abnormalities may be atherogenic, and overexpression and release of TNF-α may have a role in the development of insulin resistance and Type 2 diabetes [2]. Cell surface adhesion molecules and TNF-α are synthesised as transmembrane proteins, and the plasma soluble forms are generated by ectodomain cleavage from the cell surface. Ectodomain shedding of cell membrane forms is mediated by certain members of the ADAM [a disintegrin and metalloproteinase] proteinase family [3]. The catalytic domain of ADAMs share homology with the matrix metalloproteinases [MMP], which have a role in vascular plaque stability [4]. ADAM17 is involved in shedding vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 [VCAM-1] [3], L-selectin [3] and other cell membrane proteins including TNF-α and its receptor [3]. The ADAM proteinases also have a role in cell: cell and/or cell: matrix interactions [3]. The elevated plasma levels of soluble TNF-α and some adhesion molecules in Type 2 diabetes could imply increased activity or expression of ADAMs in these observations. Plasma LDL from people with Type 2 diabetes is structurally and biochemically different, and commonly minimally oxidatively modified [5]. However, it is unknown how modified LDL derived from people with Type 2 diabetes influences MMP or ADAM gene expression in vitro or in vivo. We have previously shown in monocytic cells that ADAM mRNA expression can be regulated by PPAR-gamma agonists [6], which is relevant as components of oxidatively modified LDL can be agonists of PPAR-gamma. We hypothesised that plasma LDL from people withType 2 diabetes would influence in vitro monocytic ADAM and MMP gene expression differently compared to control LDL. Baseline data for Type 2 diabetes and control plasma LDL donors Data shown as mean and [standard error of mean] ns = not significant.

Methods

Subjects [Table 1]

After Ethical Committee approval and written informed consent, we obtained fasting plasma LDL from subjects with Type 2 diabetes [n = 5] or controls without diabetes [n = 4]. All donors were Caucasian, non-smokers between 45 and 70 years old. Type 2 diabetes was defined as diagnosis after the age of 40 years, no history of ketosis and with stable glycaemic control on diet or oral hypoglycaemics. Patients were excluded if they had hypertension, clinically expressed coronary artery disease, were receiving hormone replacement therapy, aspirin, HMG CoA reductase ['statin'] or insulin therapy. Patients with macroproteinuria were excluded. All controls had fasting plasma glucose below 6.1 mmol/l.

LDL isolation and characterisation

LDL were isolated from fasted human plasma, containing 1 mg/ml EDTA [Na2] and 0.6% [w/v] sucrose, stored at -70°C, using a short-run-ultracentrifugation method based on non-equilibrium density gradient ultracentrifugation. Oxidized LDL in each LDL was determined using the Mercodia Oxidized LDL ELISA kit which measures the aldehyde modification of apolipoprotein B lysine residues

Cell culture

THP-1 cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 [Life Technologies, UK] supplemented with 5 mM L-glutamine 100 U/ml penicillin and streptomycin and 10% foetal calf serum, at 37°C and 5% CO2. For experiments, cells were cultured in serum free RPMI alone, or containing 25, 50 or 100 microg/ml Type 2 diabetes LDL and control LDL in triplicate, for 4, 8 or 24 hours as indicated.

RNA isolation and Real Time PCR analysis

Total RNA was isolated using the RNA-Bee™ [Biogenesis] according to the manufacturer's instructions. RNA [1 microg] was reverse transcribed in a 20 microl reaction using SuperScript™ II reverse transcriptase [Invitrogen] according to the manufacturer's instructions. Relative mRNA expression [compared to 18S RNA] of ADAM8, 15, 17 and 28, MMP-1, -9 and 14 and TIMP-1, -3 and 4 were measured by Taqman real time PCR [Perkin Elmer] as described previously [6].

Experimental plan

The choice of genes for MMP, ADAM and metalloproteinase inhibitors was based on our previous studies. [6].

Statistical analysis

Expression of mRNA for the gene of interest in each RNA sample was calculated as a ratio with 18S RNA. Each biological triplicate was compared to mRNA expression by untreated cells at the appropriate time point. All data was assumed to be non normally distributed. Type 2 diabetes [n = 5] and control [n = 4] values, all in triplicate, at each concentration and time point were compared using Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test. LDL treatments at each time point were compared to untreated controls using Kruskal-Wallis test, with Dunn's Multiple comparison test.

Results

Table 2 shows MMP, ADAM and TIMP mRNA expression of cells treated with Type 2 diabetes LDL or control LDL compared to the mRNA expression in untreated cells at each time point.
Table 2

mRNA expression for ADAM and MMP genes in response to increasing human LDL concentrations (25,50 and 100 μg/ml from control or Type 2 diabetes donors) after 4,8 and 24 hours culture

LDL concentration (μg/ml)

2550100
CT2DMCT2DMCT2DM
MMP – 1
4 hrs0.48 (0.09)0.97 (0.21)0.41 (0.14)0.66 (0.11) *0.29 (0.06)0.62 (0.09) **
8 hrs0.69 (0.08)0.63 (0.07)0.59 (0.05)0.53 (0.08)0.53 (0.07)0.56 (0.05)
24 hrs------
MMP – 9
4 hrs0.98 (0.09)1.36 (0.10) *1.02 (0.15)1.55 (0.13) *1.01 (0.19)1.98 (0.2) **
8 hrs0.84 (0.05)0.89 (0.07)0.76 (0.05)0.94 (0.05) *0.73 (0.10)0.94 (0.07) **
24 hrs0.89 (0.06)1.09 (0.06)0.63 (0.04)1.0 (0.07) ***0.67 (0.09)1.03 (0.08) **
TIMP – 1
4 hrs0.73 (0.04)0.88 (0.05)0.74 (0.04)0.86 (0.04)0.73 (0.07)0.90 (0.05) *
8 hrs0.94 (0.06)0.87 (0.04)0.90 (0.05)0.86 (0.03)0.81 (0.04)0.81 (0.04)
24 hrs1.09 (0.06)1.14 (0.07)0.94 (0.06)1.08 (0.05)1.1 (0.10)1.16 (0.06)
TIMP – 3
4 hrs0.87 (0.04)0.84 (0.04)0.85 (0.03)0.73 (0.04) **0.79 (0.02)0.70 (0.04)
8 hrs0.95 (0.04)0.90 (0.06)0.85 (0.04)0.84 (0.04)0.75 (0.04)0.68 (0.040
24 hrs0.99 (0.06)0.87 (0.04)1.01 (0.07)0.84 (0.04) **0.96 (0.05)0.86 (0.03)
ADAM – 28
4 hrs0.76 (0.05)1.07 (0.05)0.83 (0.11)1.07 (0.09)0.78 (0.1)1.23 (0.06) **
8 hrs0.84 (0.06)0.81 (0.04)0.87 (0.07)0.83 (0.05)0.72 (0.05)0.75 (0.06)
24 hrs0.97 (0.07)1.10 (0.07)0.85 (0.05)1.15 (0.09) *0.95 0.111.06 (0.06)
ADAM – 17
4 hrs0.93 (0.10)1.19 (0.08)0.81 (0.09)1.13 (0.08) *0.84 (0.12)1.11 (0.06) *
8 hrs0.94 (0.04)1.03 (0.05)0.93 (0.06)0.86 (0.04)0.79 (0.05)0.78 (0.04)
24 hrs1.08 (0.09)1.15 (0.07)0.92 (0.06)1.13 (0.07)1.14 (0.13)1.17 (0.60)
ADAM – 15
4 hrs0.91 (0.05)1.07 (0.10)0.96 (0.09)1.18 (0.08)0.91 (0.09)1.21 (0.06) **
8 hrs0.99 (0.4)1.01 (0.06)1.08 (0.07)0.95 (0.04)0.86 (0.04)0.87 (0.05)
24 hrs0.87 (0.03)0.92 (0.07)0.86 (0.05)0.87 (0.05)0.94 (0.08)0.99 (0.06)

* p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 *** p < 0.001 for Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) vs control (C) LDL treated cells mRNA expression at each matched LDL concentration and time. Data shown as a mean (SE)

mRNA expression for ADAM and MMP genes in response to increasing human LDL concentrations (25,50 and 100 μg/ml from control or Type 2 diabetes donors) after 4,8 and 24 hours culture * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 *** p < 0.001 for Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) vs control (C) LDL treated cells mRNA expression at each matched LDL concentration and time. Data shown as a mean (SE)

Monocytic ADAM gene expression [Table 2]

ADAM gene expression in Type 2 diabetes LDL treated cells was significantly higher compared to control LDL treated cells for a] ADAM 28 after 4 and 24 hours at higher LDL concentrations b] ADAM17 after 4 hours at higher LDL concentrations c] ADAM 15 at 4 hours at higher LDL concentrations.

Monocytic MMP gene expression [Table 2]

MMP expression in Type 2 diabetes LDL treated cells was significantly higher compared to control LDL treated cells for a] MMP-1 after 4 and 8 hours at all LDL concentrations, and b] MMP – 9 at 4, 8 and 24 hours at most LDL concentrations.

Monocytic TIMP gene expression [Table 2]

TIMP-1 expression in Type 2 diabetes LDL treated cells was significantly higher compared to control LDL treated cells for at 4 hours at high LDL concentrations. TIMP-3 expression in Type 2 diabetesLDL treated cells was significantly lower compared to control LDL treated cells after 4 and 24 hours at higher LDL concentrations.

Oxidized LDL

No differences in electrophoretic mobility or oxidized LDL content were detected between the control and Type 2 diabetes [Control LDL, 51.44 U/l ± SEM 6.67; Type 2 diabetes LDL, 39.98 U/l ± SEM 4.694. P = 0.225].

Discussion

We have shown that plasma LDL from subjects with Type 2 diabetes differs from control LDL in its effects on the pattern of expression of MMP, ADAM and TIMP genes in THP-1 monocytic cells. In vitro, Type 2 diabetes LDL promoted the expression of the MMP-1, MMP-9, ADAM28, ADAM17 and ADAM15 genes compared to control LDL. This suggests the lipoprotein environment of circulating and sub-endothelial monocytes in Type 2 diabetes could promote altered shedding of membrane-bound cytokines, receptors and adhesion molecules and alter cell-cell interactions. Ectodomain shedding by ADAM proteinases is highly relevant in view of the well described but unexplained increase in circulating soluble adhesion molecule concentrations and TNF-α in Type 2 diabetes [1]. The mechanism [s] underlying this consistent observation are unknown and it is not fully understood how ectodomain-shedding is regulated in vivo. The present data is consistent with the idea that Type 2 diabetes LDL could increase ADAM17 activity in THP-1 monocytes, and their ability to shed TNF-α and VCAM-1 [7]. Type 2 diabetes LDL also induced a significant increase in ADAM28 gene expression. ADAM28 associates with integrin alpha 4 beta 1, the receptor for endothelial VCAM-1 and CS-1 fibronectin, and integrin alpha 4 beta 7, which binds VCAM-1, MadCAM-1 and fibronectin. This suggests that ADAM28 could be involved in regulating monocyte adhesion to the endothelium. Alterations in monocyte MMP expression induced by LDL found in Type 2 diabetes LDL, [rather than artificially oxidised LDL] has not been investigated before. These data indicates a significant increase in MMP-1 and MMP-9 expression induced by Type 2 diabetes LDL compared to control LDL. In atheromatous plaque, increased expression of MMP-1 and MMP-9 may decrease vascular plaque stability and risk of plaque rupture [4]. If these observations are a reflection of in vivo interactions between LDL and sub endothelial monocyte – macrophages, this could promote increase vascular plaque instability in Type 2 diabetes. Subtle differences in the compositions of control and Type 2 diabetes LDL populations may be responsible for the differences in gene expression in this paper as there was no difference in the amount of apolipoprotein B oxidised epitopes. A recent study comparing markers of LDL oxidation found that LDL-ketocholesterol and plasma-ox-apoB were significantly higher in Type 2 diabetes compared to control LDL, but found no difference in levels of lyso-phosphatidylcholine [5]. Others have shown both palmitoyl and stearoyl-lyso-phosphatidylcholine to be increased in Type 2 diabetes LDL [8]. One weakness of the present study is the age difference between groups [Table 1]. We have found no relationship between age variability between ages of 40 and 60 and oxLDL concentrations in Type 2 diabetes or controls [9]. As far as we aware there are no data indicating significant change in LDL components across the narrow age difference in this study. In addition, we should emphasise the small group sizes in this study, the significant basline differences in baseline plasma triglycerides, and the need to repeat these observations in larger populations.
Table 1

Baseline data for Type 2 diabetes and control plasma LDL donors

TYPE 2 DIABETESCONTROLSp
Number54
Age [yrs]63.6 [0.93]53.0 [3.08]0.02
Known Diabetes duration [yrs]7.8 [0.66]-
M:F02:0302:02
Body Mass Index [kg/m2]30.2 [1.66]25.5 [0.5]ns
Waist – hip ratio0.88 [0.02]0.78 [0.05]ns
Diabetes treatment-
 Diet1
 Sulphonylurea2
 Metformin1
 Sulphonylurea/metformin1
HbA1c [%]6.82 [0.56]5.10 [0.10]ns
Total cholesterol [mmol/l]6.68 [0.55]6.33 [0.70]ns
LDL cholesterol [mmol/l]4.30 [0.59]4.4 [0.67]ns
Triglycerides [mmol/l]2.56 [0.31]1.39 [0.08]0.036
HDL cholesterol [mmol/l]1.22 [0.08]1.32 [0.05]ns

Data shown as mean and [standard error of mean] ns = not significant.

Despite these limitations, these data suggests that LDL from subjects with Type 2 diabetes promotes increased monocyte mRNA expression of MMP-1, MMP-9, and ADAM proteinases responsible for inflammatory cytokine and adhesion molecule shedding. These data suggest a pathway between modification of LDL in Type 2 diabetes increased MMP expression and ecto-domain cleavage of adhesion molecules and TNF-α.

Abbreviations

TNF-α: Tumour Necrosis Factor alpha. ICAM-1: intercellular adhesion molecule-1. VCAM-1: vascular cell adhesion molecule-1. ADAM: a disintegrin and metalloproteinase. MMP: matrix metalloproteinase.
  9 in total

Review 1.  Atherosclerosis is an inflammatory disease.

Authors:  R Ross
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 2.  Shedding of membrane proteins by ADAM family proteases.

Authors:  Marcia L Moss; Millard H Lambert
Journal:  Essays Biochem       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 8.000

Review 3.  Dual role of matrix metalloproteinases (matrixins) in intimal thickening and atherosclerotic plaque rupture.

Authors:  Andrew C Newby
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 37.312

4.  Paraoxonase-1 (PON-1) genotype and activity and in vivo oxidized plasma low-density lipoprotein in Type II diabetes.

Authors:  Mike J Sampson; Simon Braschi; Gavin Willis; Sian B Astley
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.124

5.  ADAM17 but not ADAM10 mediates tumor necrosis factor-alpha and L-selectin shedding from leukocyte membranes.

Authors:  T P Condon; S Flournoy; G J Sawyer; B F Baker; T K Kishimoto; C F Bennett
Journal:  Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev       Date:  2001-04

6.  Atherogenic role of lysophosphatidylcholine in low-density lipoprotein modified by phospholipase A2 and in diabetic patients: protection by nitric oxide donor.

Authors:  Kazuo Sonoki; Masanori Iwase; Kenzo Iino; Kojiro Ichikawa; Shigehiro Ohdo; Shun Higuchi; Mototaka Yoshinari; Mitsuo Iida
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 8.694

7.  LDL oxidative modifications in well- or moderately controlled type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  P G Scheffer; R M A Henry; E J M Wever; G J van Rooij; G Bos; R J Heine; J M Dekker; M Diamant; C D A Stehouwer; G Nijpels; M A Blankenstein; T Teerlink
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.876

8.  Metalloproteinase expression in PMA-stimulated THP-1 cells. Effects of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR gamma) agonists and 9-cis-retinoic acid.

Authors:  Joanna R Worley; Mark D Baugh; David A Hughes; Dylan R Edwards; Aileen Hogan; Mike J Sampson; Jelena Gavrilovic
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-10-08       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 9.  The role of TNF-alpha in insulin resistance.

Authors:  Stephen E Borst
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.925

  9 in total
  11 in total

1.  Expression of ADAM-15 in rat myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Ji Ke Li; Wen Juan Du; Shu Lin Jiang; Hai Tian
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  ADAM28 is elevated in humans with the metabolic syndrome and is a novel sheddase of human tumour necrosis factor-α.

Authors:  Jeremy B M Jowett; Yasunori Okada; Peter J Leedman; Joanne E Curran; Matthew P Johnson; Eric K Moses; Harald H H Goring; Satsuki Mochizuki; John Blangero; Leah Stone; Holly Allen; Chris Mitchell; Vance B Matthews
Journal:  Immunol Cell Biol       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 5.126

3.  Matrix metalloprotein-9 activation under cell-to-cell interaction between endothelial cells and monocytes: possible role of hypoxia and tumor necrosis factor-α.

Authors:  Yuko Yamamoto; Tomohiro Osanai; Fumie Nishizaki; Takanori Sukekawa; Kei Izumiyama; Shigeki Sagara; Ken Okumura
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Enhancer RNA and NFκB-dependent P300 regulation of ADAMDEC1.

Authors:  Lihua Shi; Song Li; Kelly Maurer; Zhe Zhang; Michelle Petri; Kathleen E Sullivan
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 4.407

Review 5.  Matrix metalloproteinases and peripheral arterial disease.

Authors:  Chiara Busti; Emanuela Falcinelli; Stefania Momi; Paolo Gresele
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 3.397

6.  Differential MMP-9 activity in CD34⁺progenitor cell-derived foam cells from diabetic and normoglycemic patients.

Authors:  J U Schmohl; K Daub; S N I von Ungern-Sternberg; S Lindemann; T Schönberger; T Geisler; M Gawaz; P Seizer
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 1.443

7.  Transcriptomic studies revealed pathophysiological impact of COVID-19 to predominant health conditions.

Authors:  Zulkar Nain; Shital K Barman; Md Moinuddin Sheam; Shifath Bin Syed; Abdus Samad; Julian M W Quinn; Mohammad Minnatul Karim; Mahbubul Kabir Himel; Rajib Kanti Roy; Mohammad Ali Moni; Sudhangshu Kumar Biswas
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 11.622

8.  ADAM9 Expression Is Associate with Glioma Tumor Grade and Histological Type, and Acts as a Prognostic Factor in Lower-Grade Gliomas.

Authors:  Xing Fan; Yongheng Wang; Chuanbao Zhang; Li Liu; Sen Yang; Yinyan Wang; Xing Liu; Zenghui Qian; Shengyu Fang; Hui Qiao; Tao Jiang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  The ADAM metalloproteinases.

Authors:  Dylan R Edwards; Madeleine M Handsley; Caroline J Pennington
Journal:  Mol Aspects Med       Date:  2008-08-15

Review 10.  Alpha-1-antitrypsin: A possible host protective factor against Covid-19.

Authors:  Mariana Braccialli de Loyola; Thaís Tereza Aguiar Dos Reis; Guilherme Xavier Lyra Malcher de Oliveira; Julys da Fonseca Palmeira; Gustavo A Argañaraz; Enrique R Argañaraz
Journal:  Rev Med Virol       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 11.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.