No direct selection to increase offspring number of bet-hedging strategies in large populations: Simons' model revisited.

In mixed or 'bet-hedging' strategies, offspring phenotypes are taken randomly from a distribution determined by the genotype and shaped by evolution. Offspring of a single parent represent a finite sample from this distribution, and therefore are subject to variability because of sampling. Contrary to a recent article by A.M. Simons (2007; J. Evol. Biol.20: 813-817), I show that selection does not favour the production of many offspring just to reduce sampling variability when such mixed strategies are used in large populations.