Literature DB >> 17714275

Positive effects of helpers on reproductive success in the brown treecreeper and the general importance of future benefits.

Erik D Doerr1, Veronica A J Doerr.   

Abstract

1. Numerous studies of cooperatively breeding species have tested for effects of helpers on reproductive success to evaluate hypotheses for the evolution of cooperation, but relatively few have used experimental or statistical approaches that control for the confounding effects of breeder and territory quality. 2. In the brown treecreeper Climacteris picumnus, most helpers are male offspring of the breeding pair that have delayed dispersal. We analysed 5 years of data (97 territory-years) using hierarchical linear modelling to test for effects of helpers on reproductive success while controlling for confounding factors. 3. The number of helpers was related positively to reproductive success even after controlling for differences between territories and breeders. A threshold effect was observed, with success increasing most with the presence of a second helper (i.e. at group size of four). 4. Feeding at the nest was one mechanism responsible for this effect, as larger groups had higher total feeding rates at all nesting stages. Higher total feeding rates, as well as higher feeding rates by helpers, were correlated in turn with greater reproductive success. 5. An analysis of the effects of helper feeding rate on reproductive success in groups with just one helper produced only weak support for a positive effect of helpers. Controlled comparisons of this kind utilize only a small fraction of the total data available and thus have limited statistical power compared to hierarchical or mixed-modelling. 6. A number of hypotheses to explain the evolution and maintenance of helping behaviour are consistent with our results for brown treecreepers including kin selection and hypotheses based on future direct benefits. 7. A previous synthesis of studies of helper effects that controlled for confounding factors suggested a pattern in which male helpers rarely have positive effects on reproductive success. However, revising that synthesis to include recent hierarchical or mixed-modelling studies suggests that helpers of both sexes usually have positive effects, and that the relative importance of future direct benefits may have been underestimated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17714275     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01280.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  7 in total

1.  Helping enhances productivity in campo flicker (Colaptes campestris) cooperative groups.

Authors:  Raphael Igor Dias; Michael S Webster; Regina H Macedo
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2015-05-26

2.  Group-size-dependent punishment of idle subordinates in a cooperative breeder where helpers pay to stay.

Authors:  Stefan Fischer; Markus Zöttl; Frank Groenewoud; Barbara Taborsky
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Contrasting associations between nestling telomere length and pre and postnatal helpers' presence in a cooperatively breeding bird.

Authors:  Martin Quque; Matthieu Paquet; Sandrine Zahn; Frank Théron; Bruno Faivre; Cédric Sueur; François Criscuolo; Claire Doutrelant; Rita Covas
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Direct benefits explain interspecific variation in helping behaviour among cooperatively breeding birds.

Authors:  Sjouke A Kingma
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Habitat selection and post-release movement of reintroduced brown treecreeper individuals in restored temperate woodland.

Authors:  Victoria A Bennett; Veronica A J Doerr; Erik D Doerr; Adrian D Manning; David B Lindenmayer; Hwan-Jin Yoon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Habitat selection and behaviour of a reintroduced passerine: linking experimental restoration, behaviour and habitat ecology.

Authors:  Victoria A Bennett; Veronica A J Doerr; Erik D Doerr; Adrian D Manning; David B Lindenmayer; Hwan-Jin Yoon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A quadratic correlation between long-term mean group size and group density in a cooperatively breeding passerine.

Authors:  Dian-Hua Ke; Yan-Hui Deng; Wei-Bin Guo; Zu-Hao Huang
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.912

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.