Literature DB >> 17714248

Genes and spleens: property, contract, or privacy rights in the human body?

Radhika Rao1.   

Abstract

This article compares three frameworks for legal regulation of the human body. Property law systematically favors those who use the body to create commercial products. Yet contract and privacy rights cannot compete with the property paradigm, which alone affords a complete bundle of rights enforceable against the whole world. In the face of researchers' property rights, the theoretical freedom to contract and the meager interest in privacy leave those who supply body parts vulnerable to exploitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17714248     DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2007.00161.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Law Med Ethics        ISSN: 1073-1105            Impact factor:   1.718


  6 in total

1.  Biobank research and the right to privacy.

Authors:  Lars Oystein Ursin
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2008-10-15

2.  "Forward-Thinking" in U.S. Biobanking.

Authors:  R Jean Cadigan; Teresa P Edwards; Dragana Lassiter; Arlene M Davis; Gail E Henderson
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2017-01-24

3.  Finding Fault? Exploring Legal Duties to Return Incidental Findings in Genomic Research.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Pike; Karen H Rothenberg; Benjamin E Berkman
Journal:  Georgetown Law J       Date:  2014

4.  You never call, you never write: why return of 'omic' results to research participants is both a good idea and a moral imperative.

Authors:  Misha Angrist
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  "That's a good question": university researchers' views on ownership and retention of human genetic specimens.

Authors:  R Jean Cadigan; Michele M Easter; Allison W Dobson; Arlene M Davis; Barbra B Rothschild; Catherine Zimmer; Rene Sterling; Gail Henderson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  Meta Consent - A Flexible Solution to the Problem of Secondary Use of Health Data.

Authors:  Thomas Ploug; Søren Holm
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 1.898

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.