Literature DB >> 17714010

Masking disrupts reentrant processing in human visual cortex.

J J Fahrenfort1, H S Scholte, V A F Lamme.   

Abstract

In masking, a stimulus is rendered invisible through the presentation of a second stimulus shortly after the first. Over the years, authors have typically explained masking by postulating some early disruption process. In these feedforward-type explanations, the mask somehow "catches up" with the target stimulus, disrupting its processing either through lateral or interchannel inhibition. However, studies from recent years indicate that visual perception--and most notably visual awareness itself--may depend strongly on cortico-cortical feedback connections from higher to lower visual areas. This has led some researchers to propose that masking derives its effectiveness from selectively interrupting these reentrant processes. In this experiment, we used electroencephalogram measurements to determine what happens in the human visual cortex during detection of a texture-defined square under nonmasked (seen) and masked (unseen) conditions. Electro-encephalogram derivatives that are typically associated with reentrant processing turn out to be absent in the masked condition. Moreover, extrastriate visual areas are still activated early on by both seen and unseen stimuli, as shown by scalp surface Laplacian current source-density maps. This conclusively shows that feedforward processing is preserved, even when subject performance is at chance as determined by objective measures. From these results, we conclude that masking derives its effectiveness, at least partly, from disrupting reentrant processing, thereby interfering with the neural mechanisms of figure-ground segmentation and visual awareness itself.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17714010     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.9.1488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  101 in total

1.  Emotion words shape emotion percepts.

Authors:  Maria Gendron; Kristen A Lindquist; Lawrence Barsalou; Lisa Feldman Barrett
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2012-02-06

2.  Cortical localization of phase and amplitude dynamics predicting access to somatosensory awareness.

Authors:  Jonni Hirvonen; Satu Palva
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Connectivity changes underlying spectral EEG changes during propofol-induced loss of consciousness.

Authors:  Mélanie Boly; Rosalyn Moran; Michael Murphy; Pierre Boveroux; Marie-Aurélie Bruno; Quentin Noirhomme; Didier Ledoux; Vincent Bonhomme; Jean-François Brichant; Giulio Tononi; Steven Laureys; Karl Friston
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Language can boost otherwise unseen objects into visual awareness.

Authors:  Gary Lupyan; Emily J Ward
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Submillisecond unmasked subliminal visual stimuli evoke electrical brain responses.

Authors:  Holger F Sperdin; Lucas Spierer; Robert Becker; Christoph M Michel; Theodor Landis
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Object-substitution masking degrades the quality of conscious object representations.

Authors:  Geoffrey W Harrison; Jason Rajsic; Daryl E Wilson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-02

7.  Dissociating conscious and unconscious influences on visual detection effects.

Authors:  Timo Stein; Marius V Peelen
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-01-04

8.  Perceptual integration without conscious access.

Authors:  Johannes J Fahrenfort; Jonathan van Leeuwen; Christian N L Olivers; Hinze Hogendoorn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Phosphene-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation of occipital but not parietal cortex suppresses stimulus visibility.

Authors:  Evelina Tapia; Chiara Mazzi; Silvia Savazzi; Diane M Beck
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Converging intracranial markers of conscious access.

Authors:  Raphaël Gaillard; Stanislas Dehaene; Claude Adam; Stéphane Clémenceau; Dominique Hasboun; Michel Baulac; Laurent Cohen; Lionel Naccache
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.