Literature DB >> 17714005

Discourse, syntax, and prosody: the brain reveals an immediate interaction.

Roel Kerkhofs1, Wietske Vonk, Herbert Schriefers, Dorothee J Chwilla.   

Abstract

Speech is structured into parts by syntactic and prosodic breaks. In locally syntactic ambiguous sentences, the detection of a syntactic break necessarily follows detection of a corresponding prosodic break, making an investigation of the immediate interplay of syntactic and prosodic information impossible when studying sentences in isolation. This problem can be solved, however, by embedding sentences in a discourse context that induces the expectation of either the presence or the absence of a syntactic break right at a prosodic break. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were compared to acoustically identical sentences in these different contexts. We found in two experiments that the closure positive shift, an ERP component known to be elicited by prosodic breaks, was reduced in size when a prosodic break was aligned with a syntactic break. These results establish that the brain matches prosodic information against syntactic information immediately.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17714005     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.9.1421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  7 in total

1.  Recognition of affective prosody in brain-damaged patients and healthy controls: a neurophysiological study using EEG and whole-head MEG.

Authors:  Boris Kotchoubey; Jochen Kaiser; Vladimir Bostanov; Werner Lutzenberger; Niels Birbaumer
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Brain response to prosodic boundary cues depends on boundary position.

Authors:  Julia Holzgrefe; Caroline Wellmann; Caterina Petrone; Hubert Truckenbrodt; Barbara Höhle; Isabell Wartenburger
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-07-18

3.  Perceptual chunking and its effect on memory in speech processing: ERP and behavioral evidence.

Authors:  Annie C Gilbert; Victor J Boucher; Boutheina Jemel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-03-19

4.  Using event-related potentials to measure phrase boundary perception in English.

Authors:  Varghese Peter; Genevieve McArthur; Stephen Crain
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 3.288

5.  Overt and implicit prosody contribute to neurophysiological responses previously attributed to grammatical processing.

Authors:  Anastasia Glushko; David Poeppel; Karsten Steinhauer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Speech rhythm facilitates syntactic ambiguity resolution: ERP evidence.

Authors:  Maria Paula Roncaglia-Denissen; Maren Schmidt-Kassow; Sonja A Kotz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Neurophysiological Correlates of Musical and Prosodic Phrasing: Shared Processing Mechanisms and Effects of Musical Expertise.

Authors:  Anastasia Glushko; Karsten Steinhauer; John DePriest; Stefan Koelsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.