Literature DB >> 17713341

Approximal secondary caries lesion progression, a 20-week in situ study.

R Z Thomas1, J L Ruben, J J ten Bosch, V Fidler, M C D N J M Huysmans.   

Abstract

There is no consensus about the definition and progression of outer and wall lesions in secondary caries. In this study we investigated whether lesion progression is influenced by an adjacent composite restoration and whether wall lesions develop at the composite-tooth interface. In order to study the appearance and progression of approximal primary caries lesions and lesions next to composite restorations, 16 samples were placed in a full denture of each of 8 subjects. Each denture housed 4 restored and 4 unrestored enamel samples and similarly 8 dentin samples. All samples were distributed over 2 sample holders, in each of which 4 approximal spaces were simulated. Every 4 weeks the sample holders were microradiographed using transversal wavelength independent microradiography and lesion depth was measured. At the end of the study, after 20 weeks, the lesion depth of the outer lesions was 0-350 microm for enamel and 0-750 microm for dentin. The estimated difference in progression between secondary and primary lesions (1.1 microm/4 weeks, 95% CI: -9.2 to 11.4 microm) was not statistically significant (p = 0.83). Secondary outer lesions appeared and progressed as primary caries lesions. No clear wall lesions were found next to composite, but they were observed next to acrylic resin. 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17713341     DOI: 10.1159/000104799

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Caries Res        ISSN: 0008-6568            Impact factor:   4.056


  9 in total

Review 1.  Models of Caries Formation around Dental Composite Restorations.

Authors:  J L Ferracane
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  Gap size and wall lesion development next to composite.

Authors:  N K Kuper; N J M Opdam; J L Ruben; J J de Soet; M S Cenci; E M Bronkhorst; M C D N J M Huysmans
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Secondary Caries in situ Models: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Audrey C C Hollanders; Nicolien K Kuper; Tamires T Maske; Marie-Charlotte D N J M Huysmans
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 4.  Durability of bonds and clinical success of adhesive restorations.

Authors:  Ricardo M Carvalho; Adriana P Manso; Saulo Geraldeli; Franklin R Tay; David H Pashley
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.304

5.  Development and calibration of biochemical models for testing dental restorations.

Authors:  Anqi Zhang; Ruoqiong Chen; Wondwosen Aregawi; Yiting He; Shuting Wang; Conrado Aparicio; Joel Rudney; Hooi Pin Chew; Alex S Fok
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 8.947

6.  Influence of microleakage, surface roughness and biofilm control on secondary caries formation around composite resin restorations: an in situ evaluation.

Authors:  Fábio Garcia Lima; Ana Regina Romano; Marcos Britto Correa; Flávio Fernando Demarco
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

7.  Isolated development of inner (wall) caries like lesions in a bacterial-based in vitro model.

Authors:  K Diercke; A Lussi; T Kersten; R Seemann
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  The influence of different restorative materials on secondary caries development in situ.

Authors:  Françoise H van de Sande; Niek J M Opdam; Gert Jan Truin; Ewald M Bronkhorst; Johannes J de Soet; Maximiliano S Cenci; Marie-Charlotte Huysmans
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Antibacterial agents in composite restorations for the prevention of dental caries.

Authors:  Tatiana Pereira-Cenci; Maximiliano S Cenci; Zbys Fedorowicz; Marina Azevedo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-12-17
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.