Literature DB >> 17712296

Image-guided helical tomotherapy for localized prostate cancer: technique and initial clinical observations.

Chester R Ramsey1,2, Daniel Scaperoth1, Rebecca Seibert1,2, Daniel Chase1, Thomas Byrne1, Stephen Mahan1.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to implement a technique for daily computed tomography (CT)-based image-guided radiation therapy and to report observations on treatment planning, imaging, and delivery based on the first 2 years of clinical experience. Patients with previously untreated stage T1-T3 biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate were considered eligible for treatment with daily CT-guided helical tomotherapy. The prostate was targeted daily using megavoltage CT (MVCT) images that were fused with treatment-planning CT images based on anatomic alignments. All patients were treated at 2 Gy per fraction to 76-78 Gy (mean: 76.7 Gy). As part of this study, 33 prostate patients were planned, imaged, and treated with a total of 1266 CT-guided fractions. The prostate, rectum, bladder, femoral heads, and pubis symphysis were visible in one or more slices for all 1266 MVCT image sets. The typical range of measured prostate displacement relative to a 3-point external laser setup in this study was 2-10 mm [3.4 mm standard deviation (SD)] in the anterior-posterior direction, 2-8 mm (3.7 mm SD) in the lateral direction, and 1-6 mm (2.4 mm SD) in the superior-inferior direction. The obese patients in this study had a substantially larger lateral variation (8.2 mm SD) attributable to mobility of skin marks. The prostate, seminal vesicles, rectum, and bladder anatomy were used to position the patient relative to the desired treatment position without the use of implanted markers. Acute toxicities were within the expected range given the number of patients treated and the dose level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17712296     DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v8i3.2320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys        ISSN: 1526-9914            Impact factor:   2.102


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of daily couch shifts using MVCT (TomoTherapy) and B-mode ultrasound (BAT System) during prostate radiotherapy.

Authors:  Steven H Lin; Elizabeth Sugar; Terrance Teslow; Todd McNutt; Habeeb Saleh; Danny Y Song
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-08

2.  Image guidance protocols: balancing imaging parameters against scan time.

Authors:  A M Bates; J E Scaife; G S J Tudor; R Jena; M Romanchikova; J C Dean; A C F Hoole; M P D Simmons; N G Burnet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  ACR Appropriateness Criteria® external beam radiation therapy treatment planning for clinically localized prostate cancer, part I of II.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Timothy N Showalter; Gary A Ezzell; Paul L Nguyen; Dean G Assimos; Anthony V D'Amico; Alexander R Gottschalk; Gary S Gustafson; Sameer R Keole; Stanley L Liauw; Shane Lloyd; Patrick W McLaughlin; Benjamin Movsas; Bradley R Prestidge; Al V Taira; Neha Vapiwala; Brian J Davis
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-10-20

Review 4.  ACR Appropriateness Criteria for external beam radiation therapy treatment planning for clinically localized prostate cancer, part II of II.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Timothy N Showalter; Gary A Ezzell; Paul L Nguyen; Dean G Assimos; Anthony V D'Amico; Alexander R Gottschalk; Gary S Gustafson; Sameer R Keole; Stanley L Liauw; Shane Lloyd; Patrick W McLaughlin; Benjamin Movsas; Bradley R Prestidge; Al V Taira; Neha Vapiwala; Brian J Davis
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-03-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.