Literature DB >> 17711840

Probabilistic participation in public goods games.

Tatsuya Sasaki1, Isamu Okada, Tatsuo Unemi.   

Abstract

Voluntary participation in public goods games (PGGs) has turned out to be a simple but effective mechanism for promoting cooperation under full anonymity. Voluntary participation allows individuals to adopt a risk-aversion strategy, termed loner. A loner refuses to participate in unpromising public enterprises and instead relies on a small but fixed pay-off. This system leads to a cyclic dominance of three pure strategies, cooperators, defectors and loners, but at the same time, there remain two considerable restrictions: the addition of loners cannot stabilize the dynamics and the time average pay-off for each strategy remains equal to the pay-off of loners. Here, we introduce probabilistic participation in PGGs from the standpoint of diversification of risk, namely simple mixed strategies with loners, and prove the existence of a dynamical regime in which the restrictions ono longer hold. Considering two kinds of mixed strategies associated with participants (cooperators or defectors) and non-participants (loners), we can recover all basic evolutionary dynamics of the two strategies: dominance; coexistence; bistability; and neutrality, as special cases depending on pairs of probabilities. Of special interest is that the expected pay-off of each mixed strategy exceeds the pay-off of loners at some interior equilibrium in the coexistence region.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17711840      PMCID: PMC2275881          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  14 in total

1.  Cooperation through image scoring in humans.

Authors:  C Wedekind; M Milinski
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-05-05       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Replicator dynamics for optional public good games.

Authors:  Christoph Hauert; Silvia De Monte; Josef Hofbauer; Karl Sigmund
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2002-09-21       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 3.  Evolutionary dynamics of biological games.

Authors:  Martin A Nowak; Karl Sigmund
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-02-06       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Evolutionary games and population dynamics: maintenance of cooperation in public goods games.

Authors:  Christoph Hauert; Miranda Holmes; Michael Doebeli
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Altruistic punishment in humans.

Authors:  Ernst Fehr; Simon Gächter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-10       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Evolutionary dynamics of predator-prey systems: an ecological perspective.

Authors:  P Marrow; U Dieckmann; R Law
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.259

7.  The tragedy of the commons. The population problem has no technical solution; it requires a fundamental extension in morality.

Authors:  G Hardin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1968-12-13       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The evolution of reciprocity in sizable groups.

Authors:  R Boyd; P J Richerson
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1988-06-07       Impact factor: 2.691

9.  Volunteering as Red Queen mechanism for cooperation in public goods games.

Authors:  Christoph Hauert; Silvia De Monte; Josef Hofbauer; Karl Sigmund
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-05-10       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  Punishment in animal societies.

Authors:  T H Clutton-Brock; G A Parker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-01-19       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  8 in total

1.  Cooperators trade off ecological resilience and evolutionary stability in public goods games.

Authors:  Joseph Rauch; Jane Kondev; Alvaro Sanchez
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  The Evolution of Cooperation Through Institutional Incentives and Optional Participation.

Authors:  Tatsuya Sasaki
Journal:  Dyn Games Appl       Date:  2013-08-17       Impact factor: 1.075

3.  The take-it-or-leave-it option allows small penalties to overcome social dilemmas.

Authors:  Tatsuya Sasaki; Åke Brännström; Ulf Dieckmann; Karl Sigmund
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Adaptive and bounded investment returns promote cooperation in spatial public goods games.

Authors:  Xiaojie Chen; Yongkui Liu; Yonghui Zhou; Long Wang; Matjaž Perc
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The Effect of Incentives and Meta-incentives on the Evolution of Cooperation.

Authors:  Isamu Okada; Hitoshi Yamamoto; Fujio Toriumi; Tatsuya Sasaki
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Individual wealth-based selection supports cooperation in spatial public goods games.

Authors:  Xiaojie Chen; Attila Szolnoki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Exit, punishment and rewards in commons dilemmas: an experimental study.

Authors:  Giangiacomo Bravo; Flaminio Squazzoni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Social penalty promotes cooperation in a cooperative society.

Authors:  Hiromu Ito; Jin Yoshimura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.