| Literature DB >> 17711816 |
Joseph Bernardo1, Ryan J Ossola, James Spotila, Keith A Crandall.
Abstract
Global warming is now recognized as the dominant threat to biodiversity because even protected populations and habitats are susceptible. Nonetheless, current criteria for evaluating species' relative endangerment remain purely ecological, and the accepted conservation strategies of habitat preservation and population management assume that species can mount ecological responses if afforded protection. The insidious threat from climate change is that it will attenuate or preclude ecological responses by species that are physiologically constrained; yet, quantitative, objective criteria for assessing relative susceptibility of diverse taxa to warming-induced stress are wanting. We explored the utility of using interspecies physiological variation for this purpose by relating species' physiological phenotypes to landscape patterns of ecological and genetic exchange. Using a salamander model system in which ecological, genetic and physiological diversity are well characterized, we found strong quantitative relationships of basal metabolic rates (BMRs) to both macroecological and phylogeographic patterns, with decreasing BMR leading to dispersal limitation (small contemporary ranges with marked phylogeographic structure). Measures of intrinsic physiological tolerance, which vary systematically with macroecological and phylogeographic patterns, afford objective criteria for assessing endangerment across a wide range of species and should be incorporated into conservation assessment criteria that currently rely exclusively upon ecological predictors.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17711816 PMCID: PMC2121324 DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0259
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Lett ISSN: 1744-9561 Impact factor: 3.703
Figure 1Desmognathus phylogeny (nj cytB) illustrating interspecific variation in phylogeographic structure among study species. Grey boxes encompass population samples of each species. Branch lengths are proportional to change (see scale in image). Black circles within rectangles depict the least-squares means (LSM) BMR (table 1; see §2) of each species, scaled to the maximum rate (100%=Desmognathus fuscus).
Figure 2(a) Relationship of range size (ln (km2)) to BMR (ln (VO2, ml h−1)) in six species of Desmognathus. Species' characteristic body size is indicated by scaled depictions of adult males. Symbols depict LSM BMR±s.e., which account for the effects of body size and temperature (§2; table 1). Hypothesis tests are based on ANCOVA and are reported in the text; the linear regression (for illustrative purposes) and 95% CI use only mean species' values. (b) Relationship of phylogeographic structure (%SD/km) to basal metabolic rate (ln (VO2, ml h−1)). Scaled depictions of adult males are as shown in figure 1. Symbols depict LSM BMR±s.e., which account for the effects of body size and temperature (§2). Error bars for phylogeographic divergence are ±s.e. of %SD/km, but these are too small to be seen for most points. The nonlinear regression (see text) and 95% CI use only mean species' values of each parameter. Star, Cowee D. ocoee; upside down triangle, D. carolinensis; circle, D. quadramaculatus; diamond, D. monticola; square, D. ochrophaeus; triangle, D. fuscus.
Analysis of covariance of ln-transformed basal metabolic rate (ln (VO2)) of six species of Desmognathus salamanders as a function of body mass (covariate), temperature and species. (Model, F10,54=274.051, p<0.0001; SS, sum of squares. Least-squares means from this analysis are used as a predictor variable in the analysis of range size and are illustrated in figure 1.)
| source of variation | d.f. | type III SS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ln (mass) | 1 | 40.0683 | 245.4518 | <0.0001 |
| temperature | 4 | 12.7417 | 8.3199 | <0.0001 |
| species | 5 | 5.2574 | 6.4412 | <0.0001 |
| error | 44 | 7.1827 | ||
| corrected total | 54 | 281.2336 |
Analysis of covariance of ln-transformed range sizes of six species of Desmognathus salamanders using maximum adult body size as an estimate of species' characteristic body size. (See text for details and electronic supplementary material for comparable analysis using average adult size. Model, F2,5=38.374, p<0.0062; SS, sum of squares.)
| source | d.f. | type III SS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| metabolic rate | 1 | 36.3543 | 81.4900 | <0.0029 |
| maximum adult body size | 1 | 2.4853 | 5.5709 | <0.0994 (n.s.) |
| error | 3 | 1.3384 | ||
| corrected total | 5 | 39.7127 |