Literature DB >> 17711710

[Effects of intracoronary or intravenous tirofiban administration in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention].

Xin-chun Yang1, Da-peng Zhang, Le-feng Wang, Li Xu, Yong-gui Ge, Hong-shi Wang, Wei-ming Li, Zhu-hua Ni, Kun Xia, Yong Lian, Yong-li Xue, Li-Xiang Ma.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects on MACE of intracoronary or intravenous tirofiban bolus administration in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
METHODS: A total of 60 consecutive STEMI patients ready to receive primary PCI were randomly assigned to intracoronary tirofiban bolus (10 microg/kg) prior to the first balloon inflation (Group IC) or to intravenous tirofiban bolus at the same dose prior to coronary angiography (Group IV), followed by a 36-hours IV tirofiban (0.15 microg . kg(-1) . min(-1)) infusion for all patients. Clinical and angiographic features between 2 groups before and after PCI were analyzed.
RESULTS: Fifty-four out of 60 STEMI patients accomplished the study. Group IC was superior to Group IV in terms of TIMI flow grade, TIMI myocardial perfusion grade, ST-segment resolution, the distal embolism of IRA immediately after PCI and ejection fraction at 5 - 7 days after the PCI. The in-hospital MACE rate and bleeding complications were similar between the groups while, the combined incidence of MACE during follow-up was significantly lower in the Group IC compared with Group IV (7.1% versus 30.8%; P = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: Intracoronary bolus application of tirofiban is associated with superior clinical prognosis compared with the standard intravenous bolus application of tirofiban in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17711710

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi        ISSN: 0253-3758


  4 in total

Review 1.  Intracoronary pharmacotherapy in the management of coronary microvascular dysfunction.

Authors:  Vijayalakshmi Kunadian; Cafer Zorkun; Scott P Williams; Leah H Biller; Alexandra M Palmer; Katherine J Ogando; Michelle E Lew; Navin Nethala; William J Gibson; Susan J Marble; Jacqueline L Buros; C Michael Gibson
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Development of local clinical practice guidelines in the real world: an evolving scene in China.

Authors:  Joey Sw Kwong; Xin Sun
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2017-06-16

3.  Efficacy and Safety of Intracoronary versus Intravenous Administration of Tirofiban during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Xiuying Tang; Runjun Li; Quanmin Jing; Yingfeng Liu; Peng Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Influence of Tirofiban maintenance duration on patients with acute myocardial infarction treated by percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Zhen-Guo Ji; Hong-Bin Liu; Zhi-Hong Liu; Guo-Ping Ma; Li-Qiang Qin; Wei Dong; Li-Ya Wang
Journal:  Chronic Dis Transl Med       Date:  2015-07-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.