OBJECTIVE: The relationship of apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype to lifetime cognitive decline was examined over 22 years in a large community-based population study. METHOD: The sample for the present study was derived from follow-up of a probability sample of the adult household residents of East Baltimore. From the Baltimore cohort of the Epidemiologic Catchment Area Study, genotype data were collected on 818 participants at the study's fourth wave between 2003 and 2004. Participants were administered the Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) at all four study waves. Three tests of verbal learning - immediate recall, delayed recall, and word recognition - were completed at waves 3 and 4. The 659 participants for whom genetic data were available had also completed cognitive testing at all time points. Test scores and changes in these scores were examined by APOE genotype group (x/x or 4/x) in younger and older subcohorts defined by age at wave 4 (< or > or = age 65). RESULTS: Cross-sectional wave 4 scores on all four cognitive tasks were lower in APOEepsilon4 carriers when compared to non-carriers. In longitudinal univariate models epsilon4 carriers in the younger cohort demonstrated a greater annual rate of decline on a delayed recall task and MMSE. After adjusting for covariates only the decline in the delayed recall task was significant. CONCLUSION: We report an association between APOE genotype and decline in delayed recall and possibly MMSE over this extended time period limited to younger individuals. The lack of an association between APOE and decline in older individuals is likely to be the result of survival bias. Although a clear association exists between APOE genotype and cognitive decline or dementia in late life, these findings suggest that over the lifespan the relationship between APOE and cognitive decline is more complicated.
OBJECTIVE: The relationship of apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype to lifetime cognitive decline was examined over 22 years in a large community-based population study. METHOD: The sample for the present study was derived from follow-up of a probability sample of the adult household residents of East Baltimore. From the Baltimore cohort of the Epidemiologic Catchment Area Study, genotype data were collected on 818 participants at the study's fourth wave between 2003 and 2004. Participants were administered the Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) at all four study waves. Three tests of verbal learning - immediate recall, delayed recall, and word recognition - were completed at waves 3 and 4. The 659 participants for whom genetic data were available had also completed cognitive testing at all time points. Test scores and changes in these scores were examined by APOE genotype group (x/x or 4/x) in younger and older subcohorts defined by age at wave 4 (< or > or = age 65). RESULTS: Cross-sectional wave 4 scores on all four cognitive tasks were lower in APOEepsilon4 carriers when compared to non-carriers. In longitudinal univariate models epsilon4 carriers in the younger cohort demonstrated a greater annual rate of decline on a delayed recall task and MMSE. After adjusting for covariates only the decline in the delayed recall task was significant. CONCLUSION: We report an association between APOE genotype and decline in delayed recall and possibly MMSE over this extended time period limited to younger individuals. The lack of an association between APOE and decline in older individuals is likely to be the result of survival bias. Although a clear association exists between APOE genotype and cognitive decline or dementia in late life, these findings suggest that over the lifespan the relationship between APOE and cognitive decline is more complicated.
Authors: Joy L Taylor; Quinn Kennedy; Maheen M Adamson; Laura C Lazzeroni; Art Noda; Greer M Murphy; Jerome A Yesavage Journal: Psychol Aging Date: 2011-06
Authors: Gali H Weissberger; Daniel A Nation; Caroline P Nguyen; Mark W Bondi; S Duke Han Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2018-08-17 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: J Wesson Ashford; Ahmad Salehi; Ansgar Furst; Peter Bayley; Giovanni B Frisoni; Clifford R Jack; Osama Sabri; Maheen M Adamson; Kerry L Coburn; John Olichney; Norbert Schuff; Daniel Spielman; Steven D Edland; Sandra Black; Allyson Rosen; David Kennedy; Michael Weiner; George Perry Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2011 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Maheen M Adamson; J Benjamin Hutchinson; Amy L Shelton; Anthony D Wagner; Joy L Taylor Journal: Neuropsychologia Date: 2011-04-23 Impact factor: 3.139
Authors: Lilian Calderón-Garcidueñas; Maricela Franco-Lira; Carlos Henríquez-Roldán; Norma Osnaya; Angelica González-Maciel; Rafael Reynoso-Robles; Rafael Villarreal-Calderon; Lou Herritt; Diane Brooks; Sheyla Keefe; Juan Palacios-Moreno; Rodolfo Villarreal-Calderon; Ricardo Torres-Jardón; Humberto Medina-Cortina; Ricardo Delgado-Chávez; Mario Aiello-Mora; Robert R Maronpot; Richard L Doty Journal: Exp Toxicol Pathol Date: 2009-03-17
Authors: Maheen M Adamson; Kelly M Landy; Susan Duong; Sabrina Fox-Bosetti; J Wesson Ashford; Greer M Murphy; Michael Weiner; Joy L Taylor Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2008-08-29 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Michelle M Mielke; Mary M Machulda; Clinton E Hagen; Teresa J Christianson; Rosebud O Roberts; David S Knopman; Prashanthi Vemuri; Val J Lowe; Walter K Kremers; Clifford R Jack; Ronald C Petersen Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2015-11-19 Impact factor: 21.566