| Literature DB >> 17711591 |
Yang-Hwei Tsuang1, Shui-Ling Lam, Lien-Chen Wu, Chang-Jung Chiang, Li-Ting Chen, Pei-Yu Chen, Jui-Sheng Sun, Chien-Che Wang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND ANDEntities:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17711591 PMCID: PMC2014739 DOI: 10.1186/1749-799X-2-13
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Figure 1Representative load-deformation curve of a triceps surae muscle-tendon unit after isokinetic eccentric cyclic loading for 1 hour at 12% strain. The curve shows a slope of 54.9 N/mm for the study group, compared with 36.5 N/mm for the control sample.
Figure 2Representative load-deformation curve of the triceps surae muscle-tendon unit after isokinetic eccentric cyclic loading for 1 hour at 20% strain. All biomechanical parameters were substantially decreased in the study group. For the control and study groups, respectively, peak load was 850.5 and 305.4 N, deformation at peak load was 35.93 and 20.9 mm, the slope of the curve was 31.1 and 20.5 N/mm, total energy absorption was 23764.6 and 3989.5 N-mm, and energy absorption before peak load was 11564.5 and 2194.0 N-mm.
Figure 3Changes in biomechanical parameters of the triceps surae muscle-tendon unit after isokinetic eccentric cyclic loading to 112% of its resting length for 1 hour. Only the slope of the load-deformation curve significantly changed. In contrast, after isokinetic eccentric cyclic loading to 120% for 1 hour, all biomechanical parameters except for the ratio of energy absorption before peak load significantly changed (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.005).
Biomechanical data for triceps surae muscle-tendon units subjected to eccentric cyclic loading (n = 6)
| Parameter | Group I, 112% Load | Group II, 120% Load |
| Slope (N/mm) | ||
| Study | 51.1 ± 5.7 | 22.5 ± 10.8 |
| Control | 36.5 ± 7.5 | 34.0 ± 2.8 |
| P value | 0.004 | 0.025 |
| Peak load (N) | ||
| Study | 970.2 ± 42.1 | 368.6 ± 238.6 |
| Control | 934.6 ± 165. 5 | 840.8 ± 111.3 |
| P value | 0.327 | 0.002 |
| Deformation at peak load (mm) | ||
| Study | 34.8 ± 9.9 | 19.9 ± 3.9 |
| Control | 33.2 ± 5.2 | 35.5 ± 4.9 |
| P value | 0.381 | < 0.001 |
Note: Data other than P values are the mean (standard deviation). For all groups, the stretch rate was 10 cm/min. In the study group, stimulation was applied with 12 mA at a frequency of 10 Hz.
Energy absorption of triceps surae muscle-tendon units during eccentric cyclic loading (n = 6)
| Group I, 112% Load | Group II, 120% Load | |
| Total energy absorbed (N-mm) | ||
| Study | 18,950.0 ± 3083.8 | 6869.0 ± 6598.1 |
| Control | 20,740.0 ± 5380.5 | 25,746.0 ± 3275.0 |
| P value | 0.268 | < 0.001 |
| Energy absorbed before peak load (N-mm) | ||
| Study | 9515.4 ± 607.3 | 3117.7 ± 2819.3 |
| Control | 12,298.0 ± 3601.3 | 11,117.0 ± 2065.4 |
| P value | 0.063 | < 0.001 |
| Ratio of Energy Absorption Before Peak | Load (%) | |
| Study | 51.4 ± 10.1 | 48.7 ± 9.2 |
| Control | 59.3 8.46 | 43.3 ± 6.7 |
| P value | 0.108 | 0.161 |
Note: Data other than P values are the mean (standard deviation). For all groups, the stretch rate was 10 cm/min. In the study group, stimulation was applied with 12 mA at a frequency of 10 Hz.